The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – In re Fitch, 2009 WL 1514501 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio May 28, 2009) (Judge Morgenstern-Clarren)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Fitch, 2009 WL 1514501 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio May 28, 2009)(Judge Morgenstern-Clarren)
A motion for relief from stay filed on behalf of MERS is inappropriate.
Summary of the Case
A year after the debtor filed a Chapter 13 petition, a motion for relief from stay was filed by MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) and an affidavit to support the motion was submitted in its name. An agreed order was reached which required . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Why Your Bankruptcy Client Doesn’t Understand You (And How to Fix the Problem)
How To Manage Incompetent, Unprepared, and Negligent Bankruptcy Counsel
Are 401(k) Contributions Disposable Income or Not?
Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims
From the Editor – Claims
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Judicial Estoppel
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019
Critical Case Comment – 10th Circuit Says No Default Cures After Month 60
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!