The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – In re Fitch, 2009 WL 1514501 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio May 28, 2009) (Judge Morgenstern-Clarren)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Fitch, 2009 WL 1514501 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio May 28, 2009)(Judge Morgenstern-Clarren)
A motion for relief from stay filed on behalf of MERS is inappropriate.
Summary of the Case
A year after the debtor filed a Chapter 13 petition, a motion for relief from stay was filed by MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) and an affidavit to support the motion was submitted in its name. An agreed order was reached which required . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Is Voluntary Dismissal of a Chapter 13 Case an Absolute Right?
Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors
Critical Case Comment – Prime vs. Riskless Treasury Rate
Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car
Meet the Newest Trustee
Changes to Form 410A Effective December 1st
Remembrances of a Retired Trustee
First Principles for First Meetings
Critical Case Comment
FFIEC Issues Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending