By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part VII Introduction This series focuses on four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), will be effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to...
Critical Case Comment – In re Fitch, 2009 WL 1514501 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio May 28, 2009) (Judge Morgenstern-Clarren)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Fitch, 2009 WL 1514501 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio May 28, 2009)(Judge Morgenstern-Clarren)
A motion for relief from stay filed on behalf of MERS is inappropriate.
Summary of the Case
A year after the debtor filed a Chapter 13 petition, a motion for relief from stay was filed by MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) and an affidavit to support the motion was submitted in its name. An agreed order was reached which required . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Present Value and Attorney’s Fees
When $400 Emergency Pushes You Over the Edge
New Federal Guidance on Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy Is a Game Changer
Measuring Success in Chapter 13: Five Years Later
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
Are Monthly Newsletters to Clients Beneficial? Heck Yeah!
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019
Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105
From the Editor
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 2 of 4