By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) On its face, Diaz (Diaz v. Viegelahn, No. 19-50982 (5th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)) is a pretty straightforward decision that struck down a local form plan as violating a below-median income debtor's right to use her tax refund to finance necessary expenses for maintenance and support. On a deeper level,...
Critical Case Comment – 10th Circuit Says No Default Cures After Month 60
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN)
Chapter 13 debtor cannot submit missed payments to the trustee after the 60-month term of the plan has ended in an effort to cure defaults in the plan. (Bacharach) Kinney v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 5 F.4th 1136 (10th Cir. July 23, 2021)
Case Summary
Margaret Kinney filed a Chapter 13 plan proposing to maintain payments on her mortgage to HSBC Bank during the term of the plan. Unfortunately, in March of 2018, disaster struck Ms. Kinney when she was involved in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
How to Present an Effective Summary Judgment Motion
WE LOVE AND WILL MISS YOU, HELEN
From the Editor – Attorney Sanctioned
The Brunner Student Loan Hardship Test: Alive and Well in The Big Apple
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part 3
Diaz: Is it Really a Tax Refund?
Small Business Reorganization Act…(“SBRA”) H.R. 3311 – Part Two
Phil Lamos – Humble Sage
Critical Case Comment
Judicial Year in Review 2021: A Quick Look at Revised Rules and Selected Case – Part 2 Selected Cases under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure