The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Claimant in proof of claim lacking prima facie validity was sanctioned. The proof of claim secured by the debtor’s residence failed to satisfy Rule 3001(c)(2)(C) requirements, including incomplete Form B 410A with no payment history. The claimant’s attempt to amend the claim on the eve of the contested objection to claim would defeat the purposes of Rule 3001(f), with amendment denied and the claim disallowed. Under Rule 3001(c)(2)(D), the creditor was sanctioned to pay the debtor’s reasonable expenses and . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Revised Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Rules
Sua Sponte Sanctions Held to Higher Standard
Critical Case Comment – But It’s a GOLF CART!
Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions Part IV
New Payment Option Available to Taxpayers in Private Debt Collection Program
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 6
Why Your Bankruptcy Client Doesn’t Understand You (And How to Fix the Problem)
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win