By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Analyzing the new "COVID-19 discharge" provision added to Chapter 131 by Congress on December 27 as part of the coronavirus emergency response legislation, the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California decided in In re Ritter2 that, in order to receive such a discharge, debtors must still comply...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN)
ATTENTION: INCLUSION OF THIS CASE AS A GREATEST HITS WAS IN ERROR - this case was reversed and remanded by the U.S. District Court in Miner v. Johnson, 589 B.R. 51, W.D.La., May 23, 2018. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Above-median income debtors are required to contribute to their Chapter 13 plans the amount of any voluntary 401(k) loan repayment after that loan has been satisfied; voluntary contributions to a 401(k) account . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Bankruptcy Rules, New and Proposed
Unredeemed Pawned Property and Chapter 13 Plan Confirmation: Must a Pawnbroker Object?
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 3 – Selected Cases under Parts IV-VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?
Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge”
Amendments to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1
New Trustee Named
Watching Where You Step on Dirty Boulevard: De-escalation in Bankruptcy Practice
Remember, Landlords Are Sacred Cows in Bankruptcy