In re Fulton: Seventh Circuit Affirms Its Position with Majority of Circuits on Passive Retention of Property as Violation of Sections 362 and 542

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN)

Introduction

In In re Fulton,1 the Seventh Circuit has restated its position on passive violation of the automatic stay, holding that failure by the City of Chicago to turn over impounded vehicles after the owners' bankruptcy filings violated Bankruptcy Code sections 362 and 542.

Fulton – Background and Ruling

The Fulton ruling arose from consolidated appeals by the City from bankruptcy courts for the Northern District of . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

The Importance of Using the Latest Master Mailing List for Serving Your Bankruptcy Documents

July 18, 2021

By Jay S. Jump, CEO, CertificateofService.com (Pasco, WA) One of the most important issues in serving your Chapter 13 Plans, Motions to Modify, Motions to Incur, Fee Applications, and other necessary documents served or noticed under the bankruptcy rules is using the most recent Master Mailing List (“MML”) from the Court. Your Court Clerk maintains and updates, on a regular...

Members

Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Transfers: Study Summary

Edward C. Boltz

June 9, 2024

Attorney Boltz shares a summary of a new study which looks at the Supreme Court ruling that noncollusive, regular foreclosure sales aren't voidable by a bankruptcy trustee, but collusive or irregular sales can be challenged by unsecured creditors, who can cloud the title if fraud is involved. The study explores when these sales can be avoided.

Members

Turnover by Motion? How About Under Rule 6008?

February 28, 2021

By Joseph A. Bledsoe, III (“Jody”), Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of North Carolina (New Bern) In the aftermath of City of Chicago v. Fulton, discussions abound as to whether it is sufficient for a chapter 13 debtor to seek return of his vehicle, repossessed prepetition, via a motion for turnover. Most seem to believe a motion...

Members

Barking Up the Wrong Tree: A Canine Conundrum

Robert G. Drummond

May 5, 2024

“ . . . creditor couldn’t fetch a break. . . . Court first found that the state court judgment was void because it was entered after the discharge order. . . . also found the creditor in contempt of the discharge injunction.”

Members

Undersecured Short-Term Mortgages May be Crammed Down

September 8, 2019

By Angela M. Scolforo, Staff Attorney to Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee (Charlottesville, VA) In Hurlburt v. Black,1 the en banc Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned its prior decision in Witt,2 and held that Bankruptcy Code § 1322(c)(2) authorizes modification of some home mortgage loans through bifurcation and cram down. This enables debtors to cram down home mortgage...

Members

Senior Headaches Caused by Junior Liens: Lien Stripping Under § 522(f)

Arya Omshehe, The Honorable John P. Gustafson

October 13, 2024

“In evaluating lien avoidance, we often default to the most common scenario: a first mortgage, perhaps a second mortgage, and the debtor’s homestead exemption. The question then becomes, is the total of these obligations more than the value of the property? If so, the judicial liens are avoided. If not, the judicial liens are either partially avoidable or fully secured.But that’s not quite how it works.” What a treat!!!! With no tricks. Judge Gustafson and Law Clerk Omshehe bring subscribers an in-depth look at the sexy topic of stripping.

Members

Travis Sasser

March 3, 2019

Travis Sasser practices bankruptcy law in Cary, North Carolina. He is a board certified specialist in Consumer Bankruptcy by the American Board of Certification and the North Carolina Board of Legal Specialization. He serves on the Bankruptcy Committee for the North Carolina Board of Legal Specialization. He is a member of ABI and NACBA. He graduated from the University of...

From the Editor

March 24, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Discharge - Direct mortgage payments unpaid by debtor were not “provided for” in plan. The confirmed plan stated that the debtor would directly pay two home mortgages to the credit union, but there was no specification of payment terms or other treatment of those mortgages. At the time of confirmation, the...

Members

What Else Does the Code Say About Interest and Unsecured Debts?

Ken Siomos

March 31, 2024

While some circuits differ, statutory interpretation suggests similar treatment for secured and unsecured claims regarding interest disallowance, unless context dictates otherwise. Attorney Siomos brings subscribers a follow-up to last week’s article.

Members

If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House

Danielle N. Gueck-Townsend

January 30, 2022

Gambling is inherently risky, but that rings even more true when a bankruptcy is involved. Section 727(a)(5) allows for denial of discharge if “the debtor has failed to explain satisfactorily, …. any loss of assets or deficiency of assets to meet the debtor’s liabilities.” 11 U.S.C. §727(a)(5). Recently, Bankruptcy Judge Timothy A. Barnes in Chicago wrote an opinion in which...

Members