By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) Have I got a story for you. A rousing tale of schedules, hearings, frustrations, and ultimately fortunes, traceable to a good story in the fee application. Maybe that's a bit overblown, but I'm telling this story with a purpose. Good stories lead to fair compensation for bankruptcy attorneys. Fee applications aren't hard Filing...
In re Fulton: Seventh Circuit Affirms Its Position with Majority of Circuits on Passive Retention of Property as Violation of Sections 362 and 542
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN)
Introduction
In In re Fulton,1 the Seventh Circuit has restated its position on passive violation of the automatic stay, holding that failure by the City of Chicago to turn over impounded vehicles after the owners' bankruptcy filings violated Bankruptcy Code sections 362 and 542.
Fulton – Background and Ruling
The Fulton ruling arose from consolidated appeals by the City from bankruptcy courts for the Northern District of . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Notice of Error Regarding Misinformation Given During Phone Call to Mortgage Servicer
Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge
Critical Case Comment–Be Careful What You Stipulate
Critical Case Comment – Debtor’s Counsel’s Fee Reduced to $48k
Two Final Observations about the SBRA – Part IX
Turnover by Motion? How About Under Rule 6008?
Tell the Story
First Principles for First Meetings
Court Supervised Student Loan Modification
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions