The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Discharge - Section 523(a)(8)(A)(ii) does not include “loan.” Denying Navient’s motion to dismiss debtors’ complaint, reviewing the split of authority on whether § 523(a)(8)(A)(ii)’s “educational benefit” included loans, and finding no controlling authority in the Tenth Circuit, the Court concluded that Congress made a distinction between “loan” in § 523(a)(8)(A)(i) and “educational benefit” in § 523(a)(8)(A)(ii). The Court adopted the “trending narrower view of Section 523(a)(8)(A)(ii) espoused in
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Eligibility “Twofer”
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof
Stop the Chaos and Fix Client Communication with Smart Tech
Meet a New AND Newish Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Sec. 328 vs. Sec. 327 Not Exactly a Smack Down
A Few of Our Favorite (Chapter 13) Things
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in City of Chicago v. Fulton
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 10 Once Again: The Supreme Court Hands Down a Procedure Rule in Dupree v. Younger
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105