The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN)
A prior servicer of a mortgage claim subsequently transferred to another servicer could be held liable if the transferor servicer provided inadequate or incorrect information to the transferee. (Aron) In re Bivens vs. NewRez LLC (In re Bivens), 625 B.R. 843 (Bankr. M.D. N.C., March 25, 2021)
Case Summary
On July 31, 2014, Wendy Bivins filed a Chapter 13 petition seeking to maintain payments and cure defaults on her home mortgage. CitiMortgage, then her mortgage servicer, filed a proof of claim indicating . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Assessing the Ailing Business Post Pandemic
No Answers?
From the Editor
From the AO
Judicial Year in Review 2021: A Quick Look at Revised Rules and Selected Case – Part 2 Selected Cases under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
In re Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), pet. for cert. granted, Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 2023 WL 6780372, (U.S., October 13, 2023).
From the Editor – Dismissal
Declining Cases and Increasing Judicial Vacancies
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
An Argument in Favor of the Mid-Case Audit: B.R. 3002.1 Proposed Changes