By Pardis Akhavan, Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP (Encino, CA) The bankruptcy court in In re Ritter, 2021 WL 864092 (Bkrtcy C.D. Cal, 2021)(J. Tighe),denied debtors’ motion for an immediate discharge under Section 1328(i) ruling that Congress apparently did not intend that a chapter 13 debtor who obtains a loan modification should also receive a discharge, on that basis alone at...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
Mort Ranta v. Gorman (In re Mort Ranta), 2013 WL 3286252 (4th Cir. July 1, 2013) (Gregory)
Social Security benefits are excluded from a Chapter 13 debtor’s Projected Disposable Income for both above-median and below-median debtors but it is appropriate to consider such income when determining whether a Chapter 13 plan is feasible.
Case Summary
Robert Mort Ranta filed a Chapter 13 petition and indicated that his “Current Monthly Income” was $3,097.46. On his Schedule I, however . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Digital Door Slammed on Debtor Violates Stay
FREE RESOURCE
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Student Loans – Suggested Statutory Changes
Meet an AO Trustee
Did Congress Mean What It Said in Section 1328(i)?
Personal Injury Attorney’s Duty of Reasonable Inquiry of a Client’s Bankruptcy
Here’s What People Should Know About Taking Early Withdrawals from Retirement Plans
The NCBJ Is Turning 100
Leadership, Office Culture, & Policy
Critical Case Comment