By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN) In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law. In a...
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Failure to include creditor on matrix not grounds to extend time for proof of claim. The Chapter 13 debtor had timely filed her list of creditors, pursuant to Rule 1007(a), but she failed to include a creditor either on that list or in the schedules, resulting in the creditor not receiving notice of the bankruptcy in time to file a proof of claim. Under Rule 3002(c)(6), as amended in 2017, a basis to extend the creditor’s time for filing a proof of claim is that . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Substantial Contribution Claims
Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice
13 documents by Independence Software – Encrypted and Scans for PII
Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 2 Rules Related to SBRA
Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium
ZOOM – Instructions/Directions from the Office of Ronda Winnecour, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee*
Navigating Secured Creditors Who File Unsecured Chapter 13 Claims
Eviction and Bankruptcy Remedies
From the Editor