ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Confirmation - Bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation. Distinguishing between “self-executing” provisions of the Code and those sections that were not “self-executing,” and discussing Espinosa’s impact on that distinction, District Court held that the bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation based on the above- median debtor’s calculation of disposable income. Section 1325(b)(1) gives only the trustee and unsecured creditors authority to object to confirmation based on failure to commit projected disposable income to plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 Signed 2/6/26
Critical Case Comment – Fee Wars: The Battle Over Debtor Attorney Compensation
Up, Up and Away – Chapter 13 Plan Balloon Payments: Permissibility And Feasibility
If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
Certiorai Denied in Evans and Doll
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
What IS a Principal Residence?
An Argument in Favor of the Mid-Case Audit: B.R. 3002.1 Proposed Changes
Saldana v. Bronitsky – Point of View