The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Renteria
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of TN
In re Renteria, 2011 WL 3584477 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. August 1, 2011) (Lee)
A Chapter 13 plan does not violate the unfair discrimination provision by separately classifying co-signed claims, even when there is no distribution to general unsecured creditors.
Case Summary
Amanda Renteria retained the services of an attorney to represent her in a family law dispute involving alleged domestic violence and paternity. Amanda’s mother co-signed and guaranteed the written fee agreement with the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
When the Trustee Gets Subpoenaed
Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020 Introduced
Critical Case Comment– Secured Creditor Granted Relief from Stay. But, Wait There’s More . . . No Proof of Claim.
Passive Retention: A Creditor’s Right or an Act to Exercise Control?
Meet Another Trustee
On More Effective Writing
Declining Cases and Increasing Judicial Vacancies
Sub V Update
Score One for the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Service of the African America Community[1]
From the Editor – Claims