The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Renteria
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of TN
In re Renteria, 2011 WL 3584477 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. August 1, 2011) (Lee)
A Chapter 13 plan does not violate the unfair discrimination provision by separately classifying co-signed claims, even when there is no distribution to general unsecured creditors.
Case Summary
Amanda Renteria retained the services of an attorney to represent her in a family law dispute involving alleged domestic violence and paternity. Amanda’s mother co-signed and guaranteed the written fee agreement with the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Covid-19 and the 7 Year Plan
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 5 – Supreme Court Activity
Form 1099G – How to Fight Back Against Scams
From the Editor – Attorney Sanctioned
Reasonable Fees and/or Questionable Attorney
Important Research Survey
9th Circuit BAP: Actually, Absolute Right to Dismiss Means Absolute
CARES Act Rebates and Domestic Support Arrears
Leading a Winning Team
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Definition of “Tax Return” for Purposes of Nondischargeability