By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This series focuses on four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019.1 One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),2 appears in its entirety in Appendix B to this series and was summarized in
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Renteria
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of TN
In re Renteria, 2011 WL 3584477 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. August 1, 2011) (Lee)
A Chapter 13 plan does not violate the unfair discrimination provision by separately classifying co-signed claims, even when there is no distribution to general unsecured creditors.
Case Summary
Amanda Renteria retained the services of an attorney to represent her in a family law dispute involving alleged domestic violence and paternity. Amanda’s mother co-signed and guaranteed the written fee agreement with the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Three Last Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 – Part V
Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13 – Part 4 of 6
On More Effective Writing
The Weak Link in the Means Test
Acquisition of Post-Confirmation Property in Chapter 13: What Remains of the Estate?
Critical Case Comment–Who is Responsible to Address Eligibility Questions?
Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, and Limitations
Taggart v. Lorenzen: Supreme Court Stakes Out Middle Ground on Contempt Standard for Discharge Injunction Violations, Leaves Clues About Automatic Stay Violations