By Elizabeth Gunn, Assistant Attorney General, Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement, Bankruptcy Specialisti In late April, the federal government began issuing economic impact rebate payments to qualifying individuals under the CARES Act. While the CARES Act specifically identified and exempted the rebate payments from reduction or offset against certain debts including federal taxes and student loans in default, the...
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Renteria
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of TN
In re Renteria, 2011 WL 3584477 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. August 1, 2011) (Lee)
A Chapter 13 plan does not violate the unfair discrimination provision by separately classifying co-signed claims, even when there is no distribution to general unsecured creditors.
Case Summary
Amanda Renteria retained the services of an attorney to represent her in a family law dispute involving alleged domestic violence and paternity. Amanda’s mother co-signed and guaranteed the written fee agreement with the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
CARES Act Rebates and Domestic Support Arrears
Evidentiary Issues Arising from Attempts to Prove Alleged “Facts” Stated in The Monster Mash
Taxpayers Should Beware of Property Lien Scam
Critical Case Comment – Ignoring 3002.1 Will Cost You
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Critical Case Comment – In the Windfalls Category
Mary Ida Townson Appointed U.S. Trustee for Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
CFPB Settles with Student CU Connect CUSO Over ITT Private Loan Program
Bankruptcy Intersecting with Tevis Equals Malpractice Claim
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13 – Part 4 of 6