By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) One of the most difficult situations faced by a debtor and debtors’ counsel is the repossession of important collateral securing a debt owed to a creditor. These items, such as automobiles, furniture, boats, and mowers which have been pledged to a creditor are important – often critical – to...
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Renteria
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of TN
In re Renteria, 2011 WL 3584477 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. August 1, 2011) (Lee)
A Chapter 13 plan does not violate the unfair discrimination provision by separately classifying co-signed claims, even when there is no distribution to general unsecured creditors.
Case Summary
Amanda Renteria retained the services of an attorney to represent her in a family law dispute involving alleged domestic violence and paternity. Amanda’s mother co-signed and guaranteed the written fee agreement with the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Collateral Repossessed Pre-Petition
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof
Eleventh Circuit Adopts the Path of Leased Resistance in Chapter 13
Critical Case Comment – Sec. 328 vs. Sec. 327 Not Exactly a Smack Down
One Woman’s Opinion
Critical Case Comment
Bankruptcy Protections Limited for Repeat Filers
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice – Part VI
Eviction Diversion Programs and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
From the Editor – Confirmation