By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Where a Chapter 13 plan provides that a mortgage payment will be paid “outside the plan,” the plan does not “provide for” the mortgage payment and, accordingly, the discharge under § 1328 is not applicable to the mortgage obligation. Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union, 909...
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Objection to proof of claim barred by preclusion. The Chapter 13 debtor objected to Wells Fargo’s proof of claim in an adversary proceeding that alleged the note had been procured by fraud and was unenforceable; but the debtor had previously litigated those and other issues in the state court. Preclusive effect of the state court’s judgment prevented the bankruptcy court’s exercise of subject matter jurisdiction. In re Jacobson, _________B.R._________, 2020 WL 1237930 (Bankr. E.D. Wisc. Mar. 13, 2020).
____________________________ . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof
Practice Pointers for Arguing Motions
From the Editor
Lashinsky v. Pennington Opinion Revoking Discharge
Meet the New Trustee
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
Surprise Sanctions: Case Highlights Critical Need for Due Process in Fee Reductions
Whose Plan is it Anyway?
Critical Case Comment
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 7