The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Passive Retention: A Creditor’s Right or an Act to Exercise Control?
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By John Andreasen and Patrick Lombardi, Law Students at the University of Illinois College of Law and Duberstein Moot Court Team Members
Both consumers and businesses often depend on motor vehicles for their livelihood or, for consumers, access to health care, child care, or other essential services. A creditor’s repossession of a motor vehicle can turn into an existential crisis that motivates a debtor’s bankruptcy filing. The debtor will want to use the bankruptcy process to quickly and cheaply regain use of the motor vehicle and, towards this end, might argue the automatic stay requires the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Quick Confirmation – BAP Says Not So Fast
Two Final Observations about the SBRA – Part IX
Critical Case Comment
Bankruptcy Intersecting with Tevis Equals Malpractice Claim
National Guard and Reservists Debt Relief Extension Act of 2023
Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey
Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? Part 2: Looking Beyond In re Rhodes
Escrow 102 – Part 4 of 4
Here’s What People Should Know About Taking Early Withdrawals from Retirement Plans
Critical Case Comment – Swackhammer Smackdown