By Mark C. Leffler, Boleman Law Firm, PC, Richmond, Hampton, and Va. Beach, Virginia In order to “eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors . . .”, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) bars debt collectors from using any “false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt . . .” 15...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
A debt obligation for a penalty resulting from fraud can be both a debt under § 523(a)(2) and § 523(a)(7) and the obligation is excepted from discharge in a Chapter 13 case. (Siler) Andrews v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, 891 F.3d 245 (6th Cir. May 29, 2018)
Case Summary
Two cases were consolidated for argument and decision, both of which dealt with the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency and Chapter 13 debtors.
Priscilla Andrews obtained unemployment . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
How to Present an Effective Summary Judgment Motion
Quick Confirmation – BAP Says Not So Fast
Personal Injury Attorney’s Duty of Reasonable Inquiry of a Client’s Bankruptcy
Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? Part 2: Looking Beyond In re Rhodes
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases – Part II: Thomas v. Midland Funding, LLC
Critical Case Comment – How Much Is It Worth – Then/Now?
Critical Case Comment–Be Careful What You Stipulate
Are Monthly Newsletters to Clients Beneficial? Heck Yeah!
Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story
Parker, HOA, and Sanctions – Multiple Thrills to a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Heart