The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Chapter 13 debtors’ FDCPA claim was not “related to” bankruptcy case. After reopening closed case, the debtors filed adversary complaint against mortgage holders and servicers, alleging various claims for violation of discharge injunction, automatic stay and FDCPA. The complaint plausibly pleaded elements required for §§ 362(k) and 524(i), but the claims under FDCPA were not “related to” the bankruptcy case, because that claim arose postpetition and did not constitute property of the bankruptcy estate. Lacking subject matter jurisdiction over that claim, the FDCPA count was dismissed. In re . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor – Claims
Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge
Critical Case Comment – Time is of the Essence
Critical Case Comment
Undersecured Short-Term Mortgages May be Crammed Down
Passing of Beloved Former Trustee
The Case of the Naked Client
U.S. Trustee Program to Implement Virtual Section 341 Meetings of Creditors Nationwide
9th Circuit BAP: Actually, Absolute Right to Dismiss Means Absolute
If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House