Leaders Must Take Action to Halt Foreclosure Crisis for Minorities

NCLC’s Executive Director Rich Dubois and NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson are calling on Congress and federal regulators to take action to prevent an impending foreclosure crisis in communities of color, in an opinion editorial published yesterday in The Hill.

The op-ed highlights how the cumulative impact of decades of housing policy discrimination on African American homeownership, coupled with the disproportionate economic burdens borne by communities of color as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, have set the stage for a tidal wave of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures in African American and Latinx communities. A recent survey by the Census Bureau found that while 4% of white homeowners said they did not pay their mortgage in the last month, 13% of African American homeowners and 9% of Latinx homeowners said they missed their mortgage payment. These gaps are likely to widen as unemployment insurance payments wane.

Even more troubling, African American homeowners were three times more likely than white homeowners to say that they could not pay their mortgage, but African American homeowners were only twice as likely to report that their mortgage payments were deferred by their mortgage company. This deferral process is a critical means of assistance that could help homeowners avoid foreclosure, keep their homes, and build generational wealth.

NCLC and its partners have been sounding the alarm on the upcoming foreclosure crisis for months, and yesterday’s op-ed is the latest in our calls for relief for struggling homeowners. While the CARES Act provided some important temporary protections from foreclosure, more action is needed by Congress and federal regulators to prevent a flood of preventable foreclosures and bankruptcies, and to promote racial equity. Specifically:

  • The U.S. Senate must expand CARES Act mortgage protections and allow for automatic forbearances to protect delinquent borrowers from foreclosure (which is already included in the HEROES Act passed by the U.S. House). Additionally, there is a desperate need for civil legal aid services, housing counseling, and other targeted interventions into communities hardest hit by foreclosure.
  • Federal regulators, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, must preserve and strengthen civil rights protections, including laws against “disparate impact.” They also should collect data and provide free public reports on developments in the mortgage market, including whether policies result in unfair disparities for African American and Latinx homeowners.
  • Mortgage companies should be required to offer affordable repayment options for homeowners catching up on missed payments, and should notify borrowers of their options in English and in notices for borrowers with limited English proficiency.

In short, it is up to America’s leaders to take immediate action to protect African American and Latinx communities from widespread foreclosure and additional loss of wealth, and to begin mitigating the effects of decades of discrimination and disinvestment.

Thank you as always for being in this fight with us, and for all you do to advocate for racial justice and economic opportunity.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

June 21, 2020
By Academy Staff The Automatic Stay is one of the most fundamental aspects of the Bankruptcy Code, providing a Chapter 7 Trustee “breathing room” to investigate Debtor’s financial affairs; and providing Debtors in Chapter 13 time to formulate and confirm a Chapter 13 Plan without facing the imminent loss of assets. Equally important, most Courts have concluded that actions in...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
A month-to-month residential lease can be assumed and defaults cured in a Chapter 13 plan. (Rucker) In re Mattoon, 2022 WL 2080184 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. June 9, 2022) Case Summary Sarah Mattoon executed a lease with Open Doors in September of 2019. Several of Ms. Mattoon’s family members lived with her in the rented apartment including her “companion” and her...
Members
October 3, 2021
By Jay Fleischman, Managing Attorney at Money Wise Law (Los Angeles, CA) When the world was forced to adjust to new routines in March 2020 due to the global pandemic, I was instantly struck by how little my professional life changed. I’d worked remotely for over a decade, and my systems and procedures didn’t change. Sadly, the same couldn’t be...
Members
August 23, 2020
By Hon. Erik P. Kimball, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (Used with permission - Originally Published by the Courthouse Beacon, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida August, 2020) Summary Judgment Applies In Contested Matters Bankruptcy Rule 7056 incorporates all of Federal Rule 56 for purposes of adversary proceedings, adjusting only the...
Members
ahern_larry_regular
September 18, 2022
Introduction In In re Village Apothecary, Inc.,1 the Sixth Circuit last month reduced an attorney's fees by half, where the professional's services were not "successful." The results obtained (or, actually, the lack of results) justified cutting the fees of attorneys for a Chapter 7 trustee by 50%. Why It Matters to Chapter 13 People This analysis of the implications of...
Members
June 2, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III and Sloan Hastings Section 523(a)(1) excepts from discharge taxes that are priority claims under § 507(a)(8). One of § 507(a)(8)’s provisions makes debts not dischargeable for income taxes requiring the filing of a tax return due during the three years prior to filing bankruptcy. It is this “recent years taxes nondischargeable” moniker that leads many...
Members
ahern_larry_regular
December 4, 2022
Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and new one new rule take effect December 1, 2022, absent Congressional action. Many reflect changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.
Members
October 20, 2019
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Objection sustained to one-year late proof of claim. The mortgage creditor did not object to confirmation nor file a proof of claim until one year after the bar date in the Chapter 13 case. The trustee objected to the claim, which asserted a higher arrearage than provided for in the confirmed plan. Section...
Members
June 13, 2021
By Daniel M. Tavera, Law Clerk to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Toledo) Objections to claims may generally be served on the claimant by first-class mail to the person designated to receive notices on the most recent proof of claim for the creditor. This simplifies the service for claim objections for...
Members
Gardner
November 13, 2022
Question: May a servicer charge to generate a payoff quote? Answer: 1026.36(c)(3) Payoff statements. In connection with a consumer credit transaction secured by a consumer's dwelling, a creditor, assignee or servicer, as applicable, must provide an accurate statement of the total outstanding balance that would be required to pay the consumer's obligation in full as of a specified date. The...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: