Leaders Must Take Action to Halt Foreclosure Crisis for Minorities

NCLC’s Executive Director Rich Dubois and NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson are calling on Congress and federal regulators to take action to prevent an impending foreclosure crisis in communities of color, in an opinion editorial published yesterday in The Hill.

The op-ed highlights how the cumulative impact of decades of housing policy discrimination on African American homeownership, coupled with the disproportionate economic burdens borne by communities of color as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, have set the stage for a tidal wave of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures in African American and Latinx communities. A recent survey by the Census Bureau found that while 4% of white homeowners said they did not pay their mortgage in the last month, 13% of African American homeowners and 9% of Latinx homeowners said they missed their mortgage payment. These gaps are likely to widen as unemployment insurance payments wane.

Even more troubling, African American homeowners were three times more likely than white homeowners to say that they could not pay their mortgage, but African American homeowners were only twice as likely to report that their mortgage payments were deferred by their mortgage company. This deferral process is a critical means of assistance that could help homeowners avoid foreclosure, keep their homes, and build generational wealth.

NCLC and its partners have been sounding the alarm on the upcoming foreclosure crisis for months, and yesterday’s op-ed is the latest in our calls for relief for struggling homeowners. While the CARES Act provided some important temporary protections from foreclosure, more action is needed by Congress and federal regulators to prevent a flood of preventable foreclosures and bankruptcies, and to promote racial equity. Specifically:

  • The U.S. Senate must expand CARES Act mortgage protections and allow for automatic forbearances to protect delinquent borrowers from foreclosure (which is already included in the HEROES Act passed by the U.S. House). Additionally, there is a desperate need for civil legal aid services, housing counseling, and other targeted interventions into communities hardest hit by foreclosure.
  • Federal regulators, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, must preserve and strengthen civil rights protections, including laws against “disparate impact.” They also should collect data and provide free public reports on developments in the mortgage market, including whether policies result in unfair disparities for African American and Latinx homeowners.
  • Mortgage companies should be required to offer affordable repayment options for homeowners catching up on missed payments, and should notify borrowers of their options in English and in notices for borrowers with limited English proficiency.

In short, it is up to America’s leaders to take immediate action to protect African American and Latinx communities from widespread foreclosure and additional loss of wealth, and to begin mitigating the effects of decades of discrimination and disinvestment.

Thank you as always for being in this fight with us, and for all you do to advocate for racial justice and economic opportunity.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

August 29, 2021
By Michael J. McCormick, Esq., McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC (Roswell, GA) Escrow 101 – Part 2 Escrow 101 – Part 3 Escrow 102 – Part 1 Escrow 102 – Part 2
November 15, 2020
By David Cox,1 Cox Law Group, PLLC (Lynchburg, VA) Click here for Part 1 II. Dealing With Balloon, Short Term and Related Mortgage Secured Claims Under §§ 1322(c)(2) And 1325(a)(5). § 1322(c)(2) provides that: “Notwithstanding subsection (b)(2) and applicable nonbankruptcy law . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to...
March 15, 2020
By Jen Grondahl Lee, Jen Lee Law, Inc. (San Ramon, CA) When is a collected fee not a collected fee? When the statutes authorizing payment to the standing Chapter 13 trustee do not provide clear guidance on when that fee is paid and/or earned. The most recent case on this issue is In re Evans (Bankr. Idaho 2020).1 In a...
May 19, 2019
By Gretchen D. Holland, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Greenville/Spartanburg Division of South Carolina Although this is a chapter 11 case, it has chapter 13 implications because the confirmation requirement that a plan be “proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law” is identical in both chapters (§ 1129(a)(3) and § 1325(a)(3)). Garvin v. Cook...
February 6, 2022
(Used with expressed permission from the MI Bankruptcy Journal and the Steven W. Rhodes Consumer Bankruptcy Conference) III. Contrasting the Majority and Minority Interpretations The majority and minority approaches differ as to (1) the interpretation of the use of "collect" in § 586(e); (2) the operative effect of parallel provisions in chapters 11 and 12 on the interpretation of §...
August 18, 2019
By Rebecca Garcia and Jan Sensenich, Chapters 12 and 13 Standing Trustees The Association of Chapter 12 Trustees (ACT2) had a wonderful day and a half conference in advance of the NACTT Seminar on July 15 and 16 in Indianapolis. In addition to Trustee participants, we had judges, debtors, and creditors counsel and representatives attend and participate. We kicked off...
May 10, 2020
By Elizabeth Gunn, Assistant Attorney General, Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement, Bankruptcy Specialisti In late April, the federal government began issuing economic impact rebate payments to qualifying individuals under the CARES Act. While the CARES Act specifically identified and exempted the rebate payments from reduction or offset against certain debts including federal taxes and student loans in default, the...
June 20, 2021
By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) To actually effect abandonment of unadministered assets in a bankruptcy case, the asset in question must appear on Schedule A/B. That’s the hard teaching of Stevens v. Whitmore from the 9th Circuit BAP. A passing reference to an asset in the SOFA isn’t sufficient. Neither was the fact the trustee explicitly knew about...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 27, 2022
The issuance of a subpoena to a Chapter 7 trustee by a third party was subject to the Barton Doctrine and could not be permitted without the parties seeking bankruptcy court consent. (Clarkson) In re Eagan Avenatti, LLP, 2022 WL 630332 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. March 3, 2022) Case Summary Eagan Avenatti, LLP, was the California law firm of the somewhat...
September 20, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Chapter 13 debtors’ FDCPA claim was not “related to” bankruptcy case. After reopening closed case, the debtors filed adversary complaint against mortgage holders and servicers, alleging various claims for violation of discharge injunction, automatic stay and FDCPA. The complaint plausibly pleaded elements required for §§ 362(k) and 524(i), but the claims under FDCPA...