A 34-year-old Chapter 7 debtor could discharge his student loan obligation by establishing that he could not reasonably make payments on the balance, could not maintain a reasonable standard of living, and because the expiration of his payment term had already passed, his standard of living was likely to persist, with no realistic future prospects. (Silverstein) In re Wolfson, No....
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
A debt obligation for a penalty resulting from fraud can be both a debt under § 523(a)(2) and § 523(a)(7) and the obligation is excepted from discharge in a Chapter 13 case. (Siler) Andrews v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, 891 F.3d 245 (6th Cir. May 29, 2018)
Case Summary
Two cases were consolidated for argument and decision, both of which dealt with the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency and Chapter 13 debtors.
Priscilla Andrews obtained unemployment . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Annulment of the Automatic Stay: A Concept Whose Time Has Come – And Gone
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)
Mary Ida Townson Appointed U.S. Trustee for Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
Critical Case Comment – Relief from Stay, Check; But Better Act Fast
In the Greatest Hits Department . . .
Unconfirmed Thus Unconstrained
Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”
Judge Brian Lynch to Retire
Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??
Supreme Court Corner: Homestead vs. Lien