By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN) In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law. In a...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Stewart, No. 13-33037 HCD (Bankr. N.D. Ind. Filed August 26, 2014) (Dees). When a below-median income debtor establishes good cause permitting the extension of a Chapter 13 plan beyond 36 months, the debtor must commit all projected disposable income to the plan for the entire term of the plan.
Case Summary
Ms. Stewart filed a Chapter 13 plan as a below-median income debtor and proposed to make no distribution to unsecured creditors, pay priority claims in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice
Are Your Loyalties Divided?
Tax Form 1099 Needs A Closer Look: Chances Are It’s Wrong
From the Editor – Claims
The Hunt for Deductible Interest – Money Too Often Left on the Table
Of Grace Periods and Mortgage Payments
Post-Petition Causes of Action, Inheritances and Windfalls Are Property of the Estate and Must Be Reported to the Trustee – Part 3 of 5
In re Fulton: Seventh Circuit Affirms Its Position with Majority of Circuits on Passive Retention of Property as Violation of Sections 362 and 542
Millions of ITINs Set to Expire in 2019; IRS Says Renew Early to Prevent Refund Delays
The Government Shutdown and Chapter 13 Plan Arrearages – What Do We Do Now?