What’s It Worth to You?

If all the children in Lake Woebegon are above average, all the small businesses our clients run are quite valuable.If the Chapter 13 trustee is asking the question, anyway.

I rail when the Chapter 13 trustee’s business questionnaire asks, “how much would you sell your business for.”

Phrased that way, the question implicates all kinds of facts that aren’t in play in Chapter 13.

First, what would the debtor have to get to part with the business . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Cathy Moran, Esq.

Head of Moran Law Group

Cathy Moran has headed her own small firm Moran Law Group in Redwood City, California, for over 40 years. Family law and tax issues as they play out in bankruptcy are areas of particular interest to Cathy.

Guesswork Doesn’t Modify Plans

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 4, 2026

Modification of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan cannot be based on speculative, uncertain, and anticipated conditions; the “best interest of creditors test” is determined at the time of confirmation of the original plan and not the confirmation of a modified plan.

Members

Does Section 1325(b)(1)(A) Hold Your Interest?

Daniel M. Tavera, The Honorable John P. Gustafson

July 9, 2023

When Does The Bankruptcy Code Require The Payment Of Interest On Unsecured Claims In Chapter 13? I. Introduction This article primarily discusses the interpretation and application of § 1325(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code in relation to the payment of interest to general unsecured creditors in chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. Section 1325(b)(1)(A) generally states that a court may not approve a chapter...

Members

Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions

January 20, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) PART I: Statutes, Rules & Supreme Court (In)actions Introduction Click here for Part II Click here for Part III Click here for Part IV What is the effect of an arbitration clause in bankruptcy? When . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content...

Members

Bad to the Bone Calls for Retro Vibes. Can You Dig It?

Molly Simons

November 3, 2024

Attorney Michael McCormick took the win when Judge Cavender of the Northern District of Georgia held nothing back in an October 2024 reported decision. The Judge made his feelings well known as he assessed and described the history of this Mortgage Claim/Lender and this abusive Debtor’s past and ongoing behaviors.

Members

Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019

December 22, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Part VII Introduction This series focuses on four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), will be effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to...

Members

Take Back Your Time and Stop Letting Clients Run Your Life

Jen Lee

April 27, 2025

"Their chaos doesn’t have to be your chaos."

Members

Passing of Wichita Attorney

The Academy

November 19, 2023

It is with sadness that we report the passing of William (“Bill”) Schantz formerly of the Office of UST.

Critical Case Comment – Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

June 19, 2022

Congress’ enactment of differing fees for U.S. Trustee states and Bankruptcy Administrator states violated the uniformity provision of the Bankruptcy Clause of Article I of the Constitution. (Sotomayer) Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 2022 WL 1914098 (S.Ct. June 6, 2022) Case Summary In 2008, the retail chain, Circuit City Stores, filed a Chapter 11 petition. In 2010, Circuit City’sliquidating plan was confirmed...

Members

Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective

August 16, 2020

By Hon. Brian Lynch, Bankruptcy Judge, WAWB “[T]he bankruptcy court has a duty to review fee applications, notwithstanding the absence of objections by the United States trustee (“UST”), creditors, or any other interested party….” In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Ctrs., Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 841 (3d Cir. 1994). In Chapter 13 cases this role is critical because in this judge’s...

Members

Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 8, 2023

Post-petition repossession of debtor’s automobile, deliberate indifference to debtor’s request for return and ignoring hearings before the Court merit not only award of damages for violation of the stay but substantial punitive damages. (Bonapfel) In re Hamby, 2022 WL 17428947 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. November 29, 2022) Case Summary Cole Hamby purchased a 2012 GMC Sierra from Everybody Rides Auto Sales....

Members

What’s It Worth to You?

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Cathy Moran, Esq.

Head of Moran Law Group

Related Articles

Guesswork Doesn’t Modify Plans

Does Section 1325(b)(1)(A) Hold Your Interest?

Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions

Bad to the Bone Calls for Retro Vibes. Can You Dig It?

Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019

Take Back Your Time and Stop Letting Clients Run Your Life

Passing of Wichita Attorney

Critical Case Comment – Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective

Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: