FROM THE ARCHIVES: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House

Attorney Gueck-Townsend provides readers with a primer on evidence needed to prove losses.

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Danielle N. Gueck-Townsend

Staff Attorney for Kathleen A. Leavitt, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the District of Nevada (Las Vegas)

Danielle N. Gueck-Townsend has been a Staff Attorney for Chapter 13 Trustee, Kathleen A. Leavitt in Las Vegas since 2010. Prior to working for the Trustee’s office, she represented debtors in both personal and business bankruptcies in the Southern District of California.

Danielle received her Bachelor of Arts from University of Tulsa in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Juris Doctor from California Western School of Law in San Diego, California. She is licensed to practice law in California and Nevada.”

Saldana v. Bronitsky – Point of View

Cathy Moran

December 1, 2024

Stay tuned as next week we will bring you the Counter-Point to Moran’s POV.

Members

Objections to Exemptions—An Exception From 30-day Rule?

The Honorable William Houston Brown

November 24, 2024

The Ninth Circuit's recently carved out a narrow exception to the 30-day objection deadline for exemptions under Rule 4003(b)(1).

Members

Subchapter V Update

Paul W. Bonapfel

December 8, 2024

The Honorable Paul W. Bonapfel, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, produces an extensive outline on Subchapter V. This is a FREE resource and is freshly updated!! Thank you Judge Bonapfel!

Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B

April 18, 2021

Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” APPENDIX B Side-by-Side Comparison of 11 U.S.C. § 1328(b)-(i) and 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)(B)-(C) 11 U.S.C. § 1328(b)-(i) Discharge 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)(B)-(C) Effect of Confirmation (b) Subject to subsection (d), at any time after the confirmation of the plan and after notice and a hearing, the court may grant a discharge ....

Members

When $400 Emergency Pushes You Over the Edge

September 8, 2019

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) The Federal Reserve reported that 40% of Americans couldn’t meet a $400 emergency without borrowing. A significant slice of them couldn’t pay it at all. So, a Bloomberg economist devoted his column to deconstructing how the press and political figures, in his opinion, misused that finding. OMGoodness. The guy was too caught up...

The Hunt for Deductible Interest – Money Too Often Left on the Table

February 16, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) One of the mysteries of Chapter 13 is why mortgage lenders don’t send an IRS 1098 for mortgage payments made through a Chapter 13 plan. And without that reminder piece of paper, our clients don’t realize that much of what the trustee pays to mortgage creditors is deductible interest. Miss that deduction and...

Members

From the Editor – Attorney Sanctioned

June 14, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Attorney sanctioned for filing identical schedules in two cases without updating financial information. The same attorney represented a debtor in two cases filed sixteen months apart, but the attorney filed essentially identical schedules in both cases, violating Rule 9011 by failing to make reasonable inquiry before filing the second case. The schedules in...

Members

Chapter 13 And Death: Discharge or Dismissal?

Michael B. Joseph

December 15, 2024

“It is said that nothing is certain except for death and taxes, but today the Court is asked a question about death and discharge, for which there is some uncertainty in the Chapter 13 context.”

Members

Constitutional Interpretation and State Bankruptcy Laws: Chief Justice Marshall on Sturges v. Crowninshield (1819)

M. Jonathan Hayes

March 31, 2024

Launching a new feature - Supreme Court Corner - Jon Hayes will periodically share a look at a historical bankruptcy case. As the title indicates, Sturges v. Crowninshield looks at state bankruptcy law in the absence of federal law.

Members

How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 2 – The “Other Appropriate Relief” of Rule 3001

Mark C. Leffler

May 8, 2022

At my firm, we see a lot of consumers who have some combination of high debt and low income. Many of them arrive for their consultations after having been abused by debt collectors and predatory lenders, harmed by mortgage servicing errors, or subjected to inaccurate and derogatory credit reporting. Until fairly recently, after filing bankruptcies for these folks, we usually...

Members