Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice

By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN)

In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law.

In a per curiam decision February 24, 2020, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Acevedo Feliciano, et al., 2020 WL 871715 (Feb. 24 . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Nancy B. Rapoport

August 10, 2025

Dear Readers: Here are my top 10 (so far) AI mistakes (in reverse order). This is a resource you need to memorize! And, um, #s 1 & 6 are particularly interesting/unnerving.

Members

An Update on Student Debt Relief and What this Means for Chapter 13 Practitioners

MaryAnn Bennett Bride

November 20, 2022

What is the Student Debt Relief Plan? On August 24, 2022, President Joe Biden announced a three-part student debt relief plan to help borrowers transition back to regular payments as pandemic-related support expires. The plan includes loan forgiveness of up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients with loans held by the Department of Education and up to $10,000 in debt...

Members

From the Editor – Dismissal

August 2, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Chapter 13 debtor had absolute right to dismiss. Facing a contested confirmation hearing, the debtor moved to dismiss the case, and his estranged spouse objected. Concluding that § 1307(b) provides an absolute right to dismiss a case that had not been previously converted, the court posed questions about whether there should be limits...

Members

Good or Bad Faith?

Hale Andrew Antico

September 10, 2023

The Ninth Circuit BAP held that the chapter 13 debtors converted their case to Chapter 7 in good faith and therefore a post-petition inheritance was not property of the chapter 7 estate.

Members

Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?

Alan C. Hochheiser

February 19, 2023

Creditors may now be subject to more preference actions, especially for those cases filed in Indiana. The Seventh Circuit recently overturned long-standing precedent that the preference period on garnishment of attachment would no longer run from the date of service or knowledge of the attachment but when the funds were paid over. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Mark...

Members

Meet an AO Trustee

February 24, 2019

On June 26, 2017, Bradford W. Caraway was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division. He replaced D. Sims Crawford who had been appointed as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Alabama. Trustee Caraway maintains his office in Birmingham. At the time of his appointment as Standing Trustee,...

Members

An Argument in Favor of the Mid-Case Audit: B.R. 3002.1 Proposed Changes

Molly Simons

August 28, 2022

If you put your ear to the ground you may hear the rumblings regarding a change to Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1 requiring the institution of a mid-case bankruptcy audit. This mid-case audit would be like the Notice of Final Cure but would be performed by a trustee’s office in the middle of a pending Chapter 13, rather than at the end,...

Members

Digital Door Slammed on Debtor Violates Stay

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

June 1, 2025

Mortgage service provider for a Chapter 13 debtor violates the automatic stay when it denies debtor the ability to make online payments through a portal which gave its customers, the option to make electronic payments.

Members

Unjust Enrichment: Where Are We Headed?

Cathy Moran

March 2, 2025

A recent decision from a Hawaii bankruptcy court, inched closer to a slippery slope on the hill of nondischargeabilty, expanding the Supreme Court's Bartenwerfer decision. See also: Unjust Enrichment from Spouse’s Defalcation Leads to a Nondischargeable Debt By Leee Miyahira, Extern, Office of Nima Ghazvini (Honolulu, HI)

Members

Between the 1st and the 15th: Is Mortgage Current?

Cathy Moran

May 7, 2023

The no man’s land between the mortgage due date and late payment is a persistent trouble spot for Chapter 13 practitioners. For example, are there arrears when the case is filed during the grace period and the payment made before it was late? In Borre, Judge Ronald Sargis of ED CA said no. He held that the payment was not...

Members