Helen Morris, the Standing Chapter 13 and 12 Trustee for West Virginia is retiring at the end of this fiscal year. I first met Helen over lunch at NACTT, where we chatted about a non-legal interest we both share, writing fiction. I was delighted to discover, then as now, a friend with a razor wit, a wicked sense of humor...
Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville)
Where pro se debtors filed numerous groundless complaints and made specious allegations against their former counsel, sanctions under Rule 9011 were appropriate notwithstanding the fact that the debtors were now acting pro se. (Hopkins) In re Jones, 2021 WL 4168110 (Bankr. S.D. O.H., Sept. 2, 2021)
Case Summary
Joshua and Amanda Jones were represented by Nicholas Zingarelli when they filed a Chapter 13 petition. Their principal conflict in the case dealt with a substantial . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
WE LOVE AND WILL MISS YOU, HELEN
Judicial Year in Review 2021: A Quick Look at Revised Rules and Selected Case – Part 2 Selected Cases under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Courts Continue to Fill in the Gaps on the Interplay of Bankruptcy and the FDCPA
What IS a Principal Residence?
Justifying Reasonable Document Requests
U.S. Trustee Fee Unconstitutional
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix A
Critical Case Comment
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13© – Part 6 of 6
ZOOM – Instructions/Directions from the Office of Ronda Winnecour, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee*