The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville)
Where pro se debtors filed numerous groundless complaints and made specious allegations against their former counsel, sanctions under Rule 9011 were appropriate notwithstanding the fact that the debtors were now acting pro se. (Hopkins) In re Jones, 2021 WL 4168110 (Bankr. S.D. O.H., Sept. 2, 2021)
Case Summary
Joshua and Amanda Jones were represented by Nicholas Zingarelli when they filed a Chapter 13 petition. Their principal conflict in the case dealt with a substantial . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Re-Examining the Means Test Cost of Home Ownership
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Applying the Principles of “Lady Justice”
Meet a Newish Trustee
Leading a Winning Team
Yet Another Reason Why the Means Test is “Broken”
Meet the Newest Trustee
District of South Carolina
How CRAs Know to Report an Account as Discharged …and How They Sometimes Don’t
FFIEC Issues Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending