The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor’s Desk – Automatic Stay
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
No stay relief to pursue dischargeable claim. The creditor’s prepetition state court actions for malpractice and negligence were dischargeable claims, and the creditor did not timely file a dischargeability complaint on fraud claim; therefore, there was no point in granting requested stay relief to pursue discharged debts. Chae v. Bennett (In re Bennett), 501 B.R. 93 (BAP 8th Cir. 2013).
Debtor wife bound by in rem relief in husband’s prior case. Applying § 362(d)(4), a properly recorded order granting in rem . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Why Chapter 13 Is a Good Idea: Outcomes and Measures of Success
The Change to Chapter 13 Law I’d Most Like to See?
A Fond Farewell to 007 – Frank M. Pees
Critical Case Comment–Sex, Lies and the Barton Doctrine
Rescuing a Troubled Chapter 13: The Unseen Threat
Taxes & Timing: Calculating Outcomes for Bankruptcy Debtors
After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay
List It or Lose It: When Actual Knowledge Isn’t Enough
Bankruptcy Lawyer Must Have Otherworldly Powers
Chapter 12 and Act2/Conference Update