Dear Readers: There are some basic truths. One is that when someone says, “hey, watch this!,” the result is likely to involve blood or stitches. Another is that, when an author describes something with the leadoff word, “interestingly,” it often isn’t. And a third is that one shouldn’t mislead bankruptcy judges. In two wonderfully written cases, bankruptcy judges made this...
The Subjectivity of Excusable Neglect
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Isabel C. Balboa, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, State of New Jersey, Camden Vicinage
Charles Schaffner, Appellant vs. United States Trustee, Appellee
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93632, Decided July 6, 2012
The District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky reversed the holding of Bankruptcy Judge Tracey N. Wise denying requests to extend the time to file an appeal and for reconsideration of the denial of the request for an extension of time.
The subject matter of the appeal commenced in June 2011 when the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees
Ms. Ps & Qs
From the Editor – Claims
9th Circuit BAP: Actually, Absolute Right to Dismiss Means Absolute
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
From the Editor
Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?
Parker, HOA, and Sanctions – Multiple Thrills to a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Heart
Who Gets Grannie’s Cash – Grannie or the Bankruptcy Trustee?
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act