From the Editor

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)

Debtor’s Attorney - Chapter 13 debtors not required to seek approval to employ special counsel. The Chapter 13 debtors moved to employ special counsel for representation in state-court litigation, but § 327(e) did not apply to Chapter 13 debtors when no request was being made to pay the special counsel from estate funds. In re Blume, 591 B.R. 675 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2018).

______________________________ . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

What the FICO? Reaffirming Doesn’t Help My Credit Score?

May 23, 2021

By The Honorable John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio (Toledo) Reaffirmation hearings during the pandemic have been difficult, at least for me. The economic risks for debtors are greater. There are uncertainties about the availability of credit, and the availability of suitable vehicles. Prices of used cars have gone up – with stimulus money pushing...

Members

City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum

January 24, 2021

By Kara K. Gendron, Esquire, Mott & Gendron Law (Harrisburg, PA) The recent Supreme Court decision in City of Chicago v. Fulton1 will change the law in most Circuits. Prior to this case, there was a split among the circuits as to whether the post-petition retention of property taken pre-petition constitutes a violation of the automatic stay under §362(a)(3) of...

Members

How Does an Idea Become a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure?

Hon. Rebecca B. Connelly

August 4, 2024

This week, Judge Connelly brings Academy subscribers a real treat. Got a rule change idea? Learn how you can help shape the process. Submit your suggestions and be part of the evolution of bankruptcy procedure!

Members

Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 5, 2021

Although a Chapter 13 debtor has the absolute right to voluntarily dismiss her Chapter 13 case, even after a motion to convert is filed, the Court retains the rights to impose restrictions on the dismissal. (Waites) In re Brittany Frances Minogue, 2021 WL 4453589 (Bankr. D. S.C. September 29, 2021) Summary Brittany Minogue filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 13...

Members

Courts Continue to Fill in the Gaps on the Interplay of Bankruptcy and the FDCPA

March 7, 2021

By Chris Hawkins, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP (Birmingham, AL) The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published its debt collection final rule in the Federal Register on November 30, 2020, revamping the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) for the first time since its enactment in 1977. Despite written comments submitted by several industry groups requesting clarity in areas where...

Members

Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors

Cathy Moran

March 3, 2024

The skills of a consumer bankruptcy lawyer must include a healthy dose of the skillset of a teacher. More on listening/communicating with Clients: Who Is Stupid Here? Why Listening Is a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Superpower

Members

NCLC Seeks Signers Urging Foreclosure Pause When HAF Applied For

The Academy

January 16, 2022

NCLC seeking non-profit organizations to sign two letters (one to the CFPB and one to FHFA, FHA, VA, and USDA) urging the agencies to require servicers to pause foreclosure activity for at least 60 days after being notified that a borrower has applied for HAF assistance and meets conditional program eligibility. We ask organizations to sign both letters, and the...

Expectations for the 341 Meeting of Creditors

Martha G. Bronitsky

October 6, 2024

This week Trustee Bronitsky brings subscribers an excellent checklist on conducting 341’s – yes, we know, unless you are new to consumer bankruptcy practice you’ve been doing them for years but chances are you too need this reminder!!

Members

Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”

The Honorable William Houston Brown

April 10, 2022

Selected Consumer Opinions Since January 1, 2022 Automatic Stay Denial of stay relief was final and appealable, although it was “without prejudice.”Deciding an issue not addressed in Ritzen Grp., Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 140 S.Ct. 582 (2020), the Ninth Circuit concluded that the bankruptcy court’s order denying stay relief was final and appealable, despite its “without prejudice” language, because...

Members

Is an Unemployment Compensation Payment Exempt?

May 17, 2020

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction As of April 16, 2020, more than 22,000,000 people in the United States were reported to have filed for unemployment aid, "a staggering loss of jobs that has wiped out a decade of employment gains and pushed families to line up at food banks as they await government help."1...

Members

From the Editor

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

What the FICO? Reaffirming Doesn’t Help My Credit Score?

City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum

How Does an Idea Become a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure?

Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story

Courts Continue to Fill in the Gaps on the Interplay of Bankruptcy and the FDCPA

Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors

NCLC Seeks Signers Urging Foreclosure Pause When HAF Applied For

Expectations for the 341 Meeting of Creditors

Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”

Is an Unemployment Compensation Payment Exempt?

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: