The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: Stern v. Marshall
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Stern v. Marshall, 2011 WL 2472792 (U.S.) June 23, 2011 (Roberts)
A counterclaim against a creditor asserting a claim is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(C), but Congress’ delegation of jurisdiction over such claims to a bankruptcy court (which is not an Article III court) is unconstitutional.
Case Summary
Vicki Lynn Marshall, also known as Anna Nicole Smith, married Howard Marshall shortly before his death. When Mr. Marshall, reputed to be one of the wealthiest men in Texas, passed away, his will . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Taxpayers Should Beware of Property Lien Scam
When The Marital Community Doesn’t Get a Bankruptcy Discharge
New Judge Appointed
341s: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
When $400 Emergency Pushes You Over the Edge
Possible Solution for Student Loans?
Measuring Success in Chapter 13: Successful Dismissals and Conversions
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment
The Extent of 362(c)(3)’s Stay Termination: Bankruptcy Court Adds an Argument to the Debate