By Hon. Brian Lynch, Bankruptcy Judge, WAWB “[T]he bankruptcy court has a duty to review fee applications, notwithstanding the absence of objections by the United States trustee (“UST”), creditors, or any other interested party….” In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Ctrs., Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 841 (3d Cir. 1994). In Chapter 13 cases this role is critical because in this judge’s...
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Lien Modification - Modification of mortgage on mixed-use property. Reviewing the split of authority on whether a Chapter 13 debtor may modify a mortgage on property used for both business and residential purposes and when the use determination is made, the bankruptcy court adopted the filing date as the appropriate time for the determination of use. Using that date, when the property was used both as a residence and as a daycare business, the court considered the legislative history of § 1322(b)(2) as favoring home mortgage . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
SCOTUS Rules Insurer Is Party in Interest, Reversing Fourth Circuit
Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective
Enforcing Chapter 13 Payroll Deductions
Thinking About the “Two-Dismissal Rule”
Supreme Court on Statute of Limitations Under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Georgia Attorney Sanctioned in Debtor’s Seventh Chapter 13 Case
Critical Case Comment
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
Is an Unemployment Compensation Payment Exempt?
Passing of Judge – District of New Mexico