College May Keep Tuition Money Paid by Bankrupt Parents, Judge Rules

By Katy Stech
Updated Aug. 11, 2016 7:50 p.m. ET

Sacred Heart University can keep money in bankruptcy of Steven and Lori Palladino tied to Ponzi scheme

A federal bankruptcy judge ruled that Sacred Heart University can keep roughly $65,000 in tuition money in a legal battle that’s grown more common as the cost of college rises and tuition payments become a popular target of bankruptcy trustees.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Melvin Hoffman ruled that Steven and Lori Palladino benefited from paying their daughter’s tuition at the private Connecticut university. The decision allows the school to avoid returning the money—paid between March 2012 and March 2014—to a court-appointed trustee who sought the money to pay debts as part of the Massachusetts couple’s 2014 bankruptcy.

“A parent can reasonably assume that paying for a child to obtain an undergraduate degree will enhance the financial well-being of the child which in turn will confer an economic benefit on the parent,” Judge Hoffman wrote in the nine-page ruling.

With his ruling on Wednesday, Judge Hoffman became the first judge in recent years to weigh in on bankruptcy trustees who sue universities—and sometimes, college students themselves—to take back tuition that had been paid by parents years before. Trustees argue that because bankrupt parents don’t benefit from paying children’s college tuition, those payments should be taken back and made available to pay the parents’ other debts. Most colleges have settled, agreeing to return a total of at least $276,434.80 since 2014, a Wall Street Journal analysis found.

Under the U.S. bankruptcy code, trustees can sue to take back money spent in the several years before a bankruptcy filing if a trustee finds the person didn’t get “reasonably equivalent value” for that expense. In the case of a child’s tuition payment, trustees argue the bankrupt parent didn’t get the value for the expenditure, but rather the child did.

In the Palladino case, bankruptcy trustee Mark DeGiacomo argued that Sacred Heart University’s tuition payments should be redirected to victims of a multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that Mr. Palladino orchestrated. He pleaded guilty to federal and state criminal charges, and in 2014 a Massachusetts court sentenced him to 10 years in prison, according to bankruptcy-court documents. Ms. Palladino pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years of probation.

University lawyer Elizabeth Austin said Wednesday that Judge Hoffman’s decision speaks to “the outrage over trustees that are pursuing universities when they have provided an education to young adults that their parents pay for in good faith.”

Mr. DeGiacomo on Thursday declined to comment.

In other cases, judges have disagreed on whether the colleges should return tuition. In 2011, Marquette University lost a battle over $21,527 in tuition when U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas Tucker in Detroit ruled that the value to a student’s parent wasn’t “concrete and quantifiable.”

Several federal lawmakers last year proposed to ban such lawsuits, saying it is up to a parent to decide whether to pay a child’s education instead of other bills. The measure hasn’t gained much traction.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

moran_cathy
March 27, 2022
I’ve been having nightmares about the 9th Circuit’s decision in Siegel for 20 years. Broad strokes, Siegel (143 F.3d 525 (9th Cir. 1998) holds that a filed claim in a no asset bankruptcy case to which no one objects is entitled to preclusive effect in subsequent litigation by . . . It looks like you are not signed in or...
Members
Relyea
July 10, 2022
For many of the consumer debtors my firm represents, the primary purpose of filing bankruptcy is to save their home or other real estate from being foreclosed upon by their mortgage servicer. We help those debtors file and comply with chapter 13 plans that propose to resolve their defaulted mortgages in a variety of ways, which might include curing pre-petition...
Members
M Joseph Photo 2-1-22
January 8, 2023
Under the CARES Act 11 USC § 1329 was amended to include a temporary provision that permitted confirmed chapter 13 plans to extend the plan term to up to 84 months. To do so, debtors were required to show they were affected by COVID, § 1329(d).i The maximum term under 11 USC §1329(c) has always been 60 months. Under the...
Members
moran_cathy
July 31, 2022
It started as a means test question: could emergency medical expenses be deemed non consumer debt. It ended up as a step back to get the bigger picture. Well seasoned bankruptcy counsel brought the fact pattern to a list serve of colleagues. The prospective debtors’ income in a small consulting corporation is declining, his health crisis raises not only income...
Members
October 6, 2019
With scam artists hard at work all year, taxpayers should watch for new versions of tax-related scams. One such scam involves fake property liens. It threatens taxpayers with a tax bill from a fictional government agency. Here are some details about the property lien scam that will help taxpayers recognize it: This scheme involves a letter threatening an IRS lien...
headshot 2021
January 28, 2024
Gambling was one of the earliest forms of entertainment, likely pre-dating recorded human history and before man invented minted currency. . . . gambling alone is not evidence of bad faith! Another article on this topic: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
Members
October 3, 2021
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Administrative fees and claims existing when Chapter 13 plan was confirmed would reduce the amounts received by unsecured creditors in a Chapter 7 under the “best interests of creditors test;” unsecured creditors, expected to receive payments over three years, must be paid the “present value” of that stream of...
Members
December 13, 2020
By Hon. William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education and Margaret A. Burks, Chapter 13 Trustee (Cincinnati, OH) Senator Elizabeth Warren (D. Mass.) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D. N.Y.) have introduced the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020. Introduction of the Act is only the beginning of the legislative process, and no action toward enactment...
gendron-1
April 2, 2023
Section in 109(g)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code bars a debtor from filing a new case for 180 days if the Debtor voluntarily dismisses a case “following” a motion for relief. Not surprisingly, courts are split on how they interpret the word “following” as used in § 109(g)(2). After all, the word “following” is not limited to one definition, or even...
Members
September 26, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) "Equity is not an old man, with a long grey beard, sitting under a tree. Equity has rules."1 Introduction Section 105 When enacted in 1978, the Bankruptcy Code in section 105 included an "all writs" statute for the Bankruptcy Courts: The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: