College May Keep Tuition Money Paid by Bankrupt Parents, Judge Rules

By Katy Stech
Updated Aug. 11, 2016 7:50 p.m. ET

Sacred Heart University can keep money in bankruptcy of Steven and Lori Palladino tied to Ponzi scheme

A federal bankruptcy judge ruled that Sacred Heart University can keep roughly $65,000 in tuition money in a legal battle that’s grown more common as the cost of college rises and tuition payments become a popular target of bankruptcy trustees.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Melvin Hoffman ruled that Steven and Lori Palladino benefited from paying their daughter’s tuition at the private Connecticut university. The decision allows the school to avoid returning the money—paid between March 2012 and March 2014—to a court-appointed trustee who sought the money to pay debts as part of the Massachusetts couple’s 2014 bankruptcy.

“A parent can reasonably assume that paying for a child to obtain an undergraduate degree will enhance the financial well-being of the child which in turn will confer an economic benefit on the parent,” Judge Hoffman wrote in the nine-page ruling.

With his ruling on Wednesday, Judge Hoffman became the first judge in recent years to weigh in on bankruptcy trustees who sue universities—and sometimes, college students themselves—to take back tuition that had been paid by parents years before. Trustees argue that because bankrupt parents don’t benefit from paying children’s college tuition, those payments should be taken back and made available to pay the parents’ other debts. Most colleges have settled, agreeing to return a total of at least $276,434.80 since 2014, a Wall Street Journal analysis found.

Under the U.S. bankruptcy code, trustees can sue to take back money spent in the several years before a bankruptcy filing if a trustee finds the person didn’t get “reasonably equivalent value” for that expense. In the case of a child’s tuition payment, trustees argue the bankrupt parent didn’t get the value for the expenditure, but rather the child did.

In the Palladino case, bankruptcy trustee Mark DeGiacomo argued that Sacred Heart University’s tuition payments should be redirected to victims of a multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that Mr. Palladino orchestrated. He pleaded guilty to federal and state criminal charges, and in 2014 a Massachusetts court sentenced him to 10 years in prison, according to bankruptcy-court documents. Ms. Palladino pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years of probation.

University lawyer Elizabeth Austin said Wednesday that Judge Hoffman’s decision speaks to “the outrage over trustees that are pursuing universities when they have provided an education to young adults that their parents pay for in good faith.”

Mr. DeGiacomo on Thursday declined to comment.

In other cases, judges have disagreed on whether the colleges should return tuition. In 2011, Marquette University lost a battle over $21,527 in tuition when U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas Tucker in Detroit ruled that the value to a student’s parent wasn’t “concrete and quantifiable.”

Several federal lawmakers last year proposed to ban such lawsuits, saying it is up to a parent to decide whether to pay a child’s education instead of other bills. The measure hasn’t gained much traction.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

April 26, 2020
(Items in italics have been added by Academy staff) . . . will be held virtually by ZOOM . . . Please visit our website at (this site has very detailed directions) for all of the details and instructions. A computer is not a necessity since ZOOM also allows participation by telephone (iphone, Android). Please visit the website before...
March 1, 2020
By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN) In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law. In a...
June 21, 2020
By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo III. Applying the Hanging Paragraph a. Application of the Hanging Paragraph – Timing of Debt In order for the hanging paragraph to apply, the debt must be secured by a purchase money security interest (“PMSI”) in either: 1) a motor vehicle...
May 28, 2023
Memorial Day 2023 Honoring the Sacrifices of All Who Served
May 12, 2019
By Judge Michael A. Fagone & Career Law Clerk Ciera S. Dye III. Policy Considerations Where the statute does not provide definitive guidance, courts often turn to policy considerations. How do those considerations weigh out here? One answer is that policy considerations cut against imposing any sort of requirement of preapproval for postpetition borrowing by a consumer debtor. Several reasons...
February 21, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction The Academy has focused at length on the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA).1 SBRA deals on its face with a non-consumer topic, but it is of interest also to Chapter 12 and 13 trustees and debtors, creating a new, more debtor-friendly subchapter V of Chapter 11 for...
January 9, 2022
It has long been a vexing question for Trustees and attorneys alike: do Debtors have to disclose assets acquired post-petition? In a lengthy and well-documented opinion, Chief Bankruptcy Court Judge John Waites of South Carolina has presented his take on this issue and concluded, with some important exceptions, that they do not. The case is In re Thomas L. Boyd,...
January 29, 2023
Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel finds no “eligibility” exception to right to dismiss a Chapter 13 bankruptcy Powell vs TICO Construction (In re Powell) 644 B.R. 181 (9th Circuit BAP, 2022) ISSUE Did the bankruptcy court err in granting Debtor’s motion to dismiss the Chapter 13? RULING No. FACTS This case tests the new “absolute right to dismiss” rule about...
May 12, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN) One of the principle goals of a consumer that chooses to file bankruptcy is to obtain a discharge under § 524. Despite its importance, however, there is much more legal discussion on the logistics and the process of automatic stay under § 362 that is in existence during the pendency...
June 7, 2020
By Steven L. Walker, Esq. (San Jose, CA) Subchapter V of the newly amended Bankruptcy Code is silent on the question as to whether the debtor-in-possession, or the court appointed trustee, must file the entity’s income tax returns on Form 1065, Form 1120, or Form 1120S. Although the IRS also has not issued any formal guidance, answers can be found...