The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Henderson
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Henderson, 2011 WL 1467934 (Bankr. D. Idaho, April 18, 2011) (Pappas)
A Chapter 13 debtor with no calculated projected disposable income, the applicable commitment period need not propose a minimum duration of a plan; Kagenveama still has some validity.
Case Summary
The Hendersons’ Schedules I and J revealed monthly net income of $1,140. The calculations on their 22C, however, yielded a negative disposable income of -$184. The difference between the I and J income and the 22C income was because the 22C “expenses” were greater than their actual expenses . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – A Mixed Bag of Inheritance
Critical Case Comment – And There is Also Blanco
Cyber Security – You Are The Weakest Link
Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105
Passing of Affable, Humanitarian Trustee
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
Obtaining Credit in Chapter 13 – Did the Amendment to FRBP 4001(c) Eliminate Motions to Incur Additional Credit?
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 10 Once Again: The Supreme Court Hands Down a Procedure Rule in Dupree v. Younger
FROM THE ARCHIVES: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
Escrow 102 – Part 1 of 4