The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Henderson
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Henderson, 2011 WL 1467934 (Bankr. D. Idaho, April 18, 2011) (Pappas)
A Chapter 13 debtor with no calculated projected disposable income, the applicable commitment period need not propose a minimum duration of a plan; Kagenveama still has some validity.
Case Summary
The Hendersons’ Schedules I and J revealed monthly net income of $1,140. The calculations on their 22C, however, yielded a negative disposable income of -$184. The difference between the I and J income and the 22C income was because the 22C “expenses” were greater than their actual expenses . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
U.S. Trustee Fee Unconstitutional
Critical Case Comment – Pre to Pre and Post to Post
HELOC Lender’s Rule 3002.1 Charges Pass the Test
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 3 of 4
Who Is Stupid Here?
Mary Ida Townson Appointed U.S. Trustee for Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey