Covid-19 and the 7 Year Plan

By Ken Siomos, Staff Attorney for Marsha L. Combs-Skinner (Newman, IL)

A small part of the recently passed “Cares Act” is the ability of Chapter 13 debtors experiencing a “material financial hardship” as a result of the covid-19 pandemic to modify their plan to 84 months.i Many Chapter 13 Trustee’s are likely anticipating a series of Chapter 13 Plan defaults and requests for moratoriums on Chapter 13 payments; the extension of plans by up to 24 months (or 48 months for those who confirmed a 36 month Plan) will certainly help debtors who are required to make up this period of non-payment to the Chapter 13 Trustee, especially if they are also going to be catching up on their direct-pay mortgage/rent and/or car payments missed during this period of suddenly record-high unemployment. For all of the criticism of Congress for its neglect in drafting clear bankruptcy legislation, I do applaud them for even considering the implications of covid-19 for bankruptcy debtors.

However, there is a material and arbitrary limitation within the Cares Act – the Plan must be confirmed, “prior to the date of enactment of this subsection.”ii Moreover, the Act does not modify 1322 or 1325 to allow a debtor to confirm an 84 month Plan, even if suffering a “material economic hardship” from covid-19. In short, a debtor suffering covid-19 related hardship who confirms their plan the day prior to the enactment date of the “Cares Act” could immediately modify their 60 month Plan to extend it by 24 months, decreasing their payment by an average of 29%,iii while a similar debtor whose plan is not confirmed prior to the effective date of the Act is unable to access those additional 24 months either by confirming a longer plan or modifying their plan after confirmation.

Congress certainly had to act quickly with respect to covid-19 and I certainly appreciate that the bankruptcy implications on current monthly income, projected disposable income, and plan length were considered at all; however, as quickly as reasonably practicable, technical corrections to Section 1113 should be made such that debtors suffering “material financial hardship” are a result of covid-19, who are unable to confirm prior to the date of enactment, have the same opportunity to extend the length of their Plan as debtors who are only differentiated by the date of their confirmation order.


[i] Section 1113(d)(1)

[ii] Id.

[iii] Assuming even monthly payments and a 60 month Plan, an extension of 24 months is a 40% increase in length but 24 out of 84 months is 28.57% and therefore a hypothetical $100 x 60 Plan could be changed to a $71.43 x 84 Plan, a 29% decrease in payment to reach a $6,000.00 “base.”


Ken Siomos Photo Ken Siomos has been the Staff Attorney for Marsha L. Combs-Skinner, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, in the Central District of Illinois, since July 2018. He was previously Staff Attorney for John H. Germeraad, the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Springfield Division of the Central District of Illinois, until the Trustee’s retirement at the end of June 2018. Siomos graduated magna cum laude from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign College of Law. He previously attended North Central College and graduated cum laude with degrees in economics and finance.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

September 22, 2019
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Chapter 7 trustee’s avoidance of post-petition mortgage lien. After filing Chapter 7, the debtor, without prior authority, refinanced property of the estate twice and the trustee sought avoidance of the mortgage lien under § 549. No defense was available because the mortgagee did not qualify as a good faith transferee, having knowledge of...
November 3, 2019
Kristina Stanger is an attorney and shareholder at Iowa’s Nyemaster Goode, P.C. She is also a combat-experienced Lieutenant Colonel in the Iowa Army National Guard. She is currently one of Iowa’s highest ranking females and is the Chief of Plans and Operations for the Iowa Army National Guard. Jessica Hopton Youngberg is Senior Staff Attorney for Veterans Legal Services in...
leforceheadshotcropped (2)
January 16, 2022
When do the facts justify a long bar to refiling over the 180-day period in § 109(g)? Sometimes it is Justice Stewart’s infamous words from Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 187 (1964)–“I know it when I see it.” Even so, a Trustee must provide evidence and authority to the Court for a long prejudice period. In In re Parson 2021...
February 10, 2019
Jan M. Sensenich graduated from Windham College in Putney, Vermont in 1978 and Vermont Law School in 1983. He served as Core Faculty Member and Director of the Woodbury College Legal Clinic from 1983 to 1987and from 1990 to 1992. Jan was an Associate with Jerome I. Meyers, P.C. from 1987 to 1990 when he opened his own practice concentrating...
January 30, 2022
Background A recent Chapter 7 case out of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, In re Rhodes,1 addresses reaffirmation in a context that is very significant and should be of interest to all debtor's attorneys. It points out that the "ride-through" of a debtor's secured debt in Chapter 7—which Congress tried to eliminate in 2005—still exists. In...
February 16, 2020
Although she steps into very large shoes, Julie Philippi is a welcome addition to the Chapter 13 Trustee fraternity. Ms. Philippi was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Western District of New York on January 1, 2020. Those large shoes were left by retiring NACTT icon, Albert Mogavero. “Al” served as Standing Trustee for 42 years (yep,...
September 22, 2019
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Tax foreclosure sale avoided as preference. Affirming the District and Bankruptcy Courts, at 571 B.R. 662 and 588 B.R. 394, the Third Circuit held that the Chapter 13 debtors could avoid a pre-petition tax foreclosure sale as a preferential transfer. The township held a properly noticed tax sale at public auction, which resulted...
January 10, 2021
By Rachel Jones, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Chris Micale, Western District of Virginia (Roanoke) The events of 2020 have had a devastating impact on the very low-income population. The working poor are struggling, particularly those working in sectors such as hospitality and tourism. State and Federal funding and local programs such as food banks and community action...
May 28, 2023
Retirement of Judge David Robert Duncan
October 11, 2020
By James J. Robinson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Alabama What are the statutory duties of the standing chapter 13 trustee? Bankruptcy Code §§ 1302 and 704 provide the statutory framework for the trustee’s duties, and provide as follows: 11 U.S.C. § 1302. Trustee (a) If the United States trustee appoints an individual under section 586(b) of...