From the Editor

From the Editor – Claims

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Unreasonable fees for proof of claim. $4,000 fee for private mortgagee’s proof of claim and objection to proposed plan was unreasonable, and creditor was denied recovery of $7,500 attorney fee for responding to debtor’s objection to proof of claim. The Court considered Fannie Mae’s guidelines for maximum fees related to proof of claim in Chapter 13 ($650) and objections to a plan ($500). In re Bulger, 606 B.R. 526 (Bankr. W.D. N.Y. 2019).

____________________________ . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

9th Circuit Joins the Bandwagon

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

June 18, 2023

The Ninth Circuit has now joined its sister Circuit in holding that the Bankruptcy Code does not permita Chapter 13 Trustee to retain the percentage fees collected on payments that a chapter 13 debtor made pre-confirmation in accordance with 26 U.S.C. §586 but, upon dismissal prior to confirmation of the plan, is obligated to return the fee to the debtor,...

Members

Director Removed

The Academy

March 16, 2025

Trump's Justice Department Shakeup Hits Bankruptcy Watchdog Making the Bankruptcy System Less Great

Sua Sponte Sanctions Held to Higher Standard

Cathy Moran

January 14, 2024

9th Cir. BAP erected high bar for sanctions. And, interestingly, at the heart of the BAP’s decision was the very fact that BAP decisions are not binding.

Members

Director’s Awards Recognize 19 Employees for Leadership, Service

The Academy

December 10, 2023

Congratulations to all but specifically the two bankruptcy courts with recognized recipients!

Georgia Attorney Sanctioned in Debtor’s Seventh Chapter 13 Case

M. Jonathan Hayes

September 8, 2024

Apparently, seventh time’s the harm. In this case, aggressive lawyering’ crosses the line.

Members

Critical Case Comment – Repeat: No Fee Splitting

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 23, 2022

A referral fee by retained special counsel paid to debtor’s attorney violates the prohibition in § 504 in that it constitutes an unauthorized splitting of attorney’s fees. (Williamson) In re Davis, 638 B.R. 198 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. March 31, 2022) Case Summary Four years after Lisa Davis filed her Chapter 13 petition, she was involved in an auto accident resulting...

Members

Conflicting Interpretations: A Chapter 13 Trustee’s Compensation After Pre-Confirmation Dismissal or Conversion – Part 2 of 3

Brittani Bushman

February 6, 2022

(Used with expressed permission from the MI Bankruptcy Journal and the Steven W. Rhodes Consumer Bankruptcy Conference) III. Contrasting the Majority and Minority Interpretations The majority and minority approaches differ as to (1) the interpretation of the use of "collect" in § 586(e); (2) the operative effect of parallel provisions in chapters 11 and 12 on the interpretation of §...

Members

Is Voluntary Dismissal of a Chapter 13 Case an Absolute Right?

July 12, 2020

By Daryl J. Smith, Senior Staff Attorney to Sylvia Ford Brown, Chapter 13 Trustee (Memphis, TN) and Katherine L. Rea, Staff Attorney to Pamela Simmons-Beasley, Chapter 13 Trustee (Columbia, SC) Is there ever a reason to oppose a voluntary dismissal of a chapter 13 that has not been converted from a chapter 7? Maybe. But will you be successful? Probably...

Members

April 7, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Attorney Fees - Chapter 13 debtor’s attorney not entitled to recovery under § 330 of fees that were incurred in defending prior attorneys’ sanctions motion. The debtor’s prior attorneys had sought to impose sanctions on the current attorney, and that attorney successfully defended against sanctions. However, the fees incurred by the...

Members

Critical Case Comment – No POC, No Money

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

April 30, 2023

A secured creditor would not be granted relief from the stay because the motion was based on the creditor’s failure to file a timely proof of claim. (Grant) In re Flores, 2023 WL 2787514 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. March 8, 2023) Case Summary Mr. Flores filed a petition under Chapter 13 proposing to pay Gaeta Auto Sales in full, with interest,via...

Members

From the Editor – Claims

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

9th Circuit Joins the Bandwagon

Director Removed

Sua Sponte Sanctions Held to Higher Standard

Director’s Awards Recognize 19 Employees for Leadership, Service

Georgia Attorney Sanctioned in Debtor’s Seventh Chapter 13 Case

Critical Case Comment – Repeat: No Fee Splitting

Conflicting Interpretations: A Chapter 13 Trustee’s Compensation After Pre-Confirmation Dismissal or Conversion – Part 2 of 3

Is Voluntary Dismissal of a Chapter 13 Case an Absolute Right?

From the Editor

Critical Case Comment – No POC, No Money

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: