Selected Consumer Opinions Since January 1, 2022 Automatic Stay Denial of stay relief was final and appealable, although it was “without prejudice.”Deciding an issue not addressed in Ritzen Grp., Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 140 S.Ct. 582 (2020), the Ninth Circuit concluded that the bankruptcy court’s order denying stay relief was final and appealable, despite its “without prejudice” language, because...
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Unreasonable fees for proof of claim. $4,000 fee for private mortgagee’s proof of claim and objection to proposed plan was unreasonable, and creditor was denied recovery of $7,500 attorney fee for responding to debtor’s objection to proof of claim. The Court considered Fannie Mae’s guidelines for maximum fees related to proof of claim in Chapter 13 ($650) and objections to a plan ($500). In re Bulger, 606 B.R. 526 (Bankr. W.D. N.Y. 2019).
____________________________ . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Turnover by Motion? How About Under Rule 6008?
Negotiating Plan Confirmation with Secured Creditors – Issues Involving Balloon Payments and Other Mortgage Loans Subject to Modification Under § 1322(c) – Part 2 of 3
The Hunt for Deductible Interest – Money Too Often Left on the Table
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
Best Practices in Bankruptcy: Power of Attorney or Guardian
Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Not Current But May Invoke CARES Remedies
Thoughts on the Law: “None of My Business” Or “CU Later”? – Does Refusing to Do Business with a Debtor Violate the Automatic Stay?
First Principles for First Meetings