The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Hanging Paragraph, Cars for Non-Personal Use, and PMSI
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Gretchen Holland, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Greenville/Spartanburg Division of South Carolina
The hanging paragraph of § 1325(a)(9) prevents bifurcation of a PMSI claim if the collateral securing it was purchased within certain time periods prepetition. A 910-day limitation applies to motor vehicles acquired for the debtor’s personal use. A one-year limitation applies to all other PMSI collateral, including a vehicle purchased for non-personal use. In re Sandifer, 603 B.R. 648 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. July 17, 2019)
Background
Debtor and . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The First Thing a Chapter 13 Debtor’s Attorney Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019
Meet a New AND Newish Trustee
All Taxpayers Should Plan Ahead for Natural Disasters
Looking Beyond Taggart: Is the Contempt Standard for a Stay Violation the Same as for a Discharge Injunction Violation?
From the Editor – Claims
Three Last Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 – Part V
Measuring Success in Chapter 13: Successful Dismissals and Conversions
The Dangers of Extending a Plan Too Long – Or Alternatively, Why Take as Little Time as Possible
Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win
Turnover by Motion? How About Under Rule 6008?