Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Appendix 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3) and (4), Showing Changes Made by Consolidated Appropriation Act, 2021 ("CAA"), Pub. L. 116-260, 134 Stat. 1182 (eff. Dec. 27, 2020) (Sunset December 27, 2022. Changes continue to apply in cases commenced before sunset under subchapter V of Chapter 11.) 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3) Pre-CAA Post-CAA...
From the Editor – Claims and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Rule 9011 doesn’t provide basis for sanction against claimant for filing stale proof of claim. First holding that the Chapter 13 debtor had sufficient personal interest in the allowance or disallowance of a proof of claim to have standing, the proof of claim for a time-barred debt under Pennsylvania law was disallowed. The claim was unenforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law. However, the debtor’s motion for sanctions against the claimant under Rule 9011(b) was denied. The court reviewed the conflicting case authority on whether Rule 9011 . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment
Still Trying to Apply Taggart: Fourth Circuit Vacates Beckhart v. Newrez, LLC
The Smart Way to Cut Out the IRS
Remembrances of a Retired Trustee
These Summer Activities Can Affect Next Year’s Tax Returns
Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation
SBRA – The Sequel: Leases in Bankruptcy Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (“CAA”)
Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105
Extensions of CARES Act Provisions By COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021
From the Editor – Dismissal