The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Rule 9011 doesn’t provide basis for sanction against claimant for filing stale proof of claim. First holding that the Chapter 13 debtor had sufficient personal interest in the allowance or disallowance of a proof of claim to have standing, the proof of claim for a time-barred debt under Pennsylvania law was disallowed. The claim was unenforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law. However, the debtor’s motion for sanctions against the claimant under Rule 9011(b) was denied. The court reviewed the conflicting case authority on whether Rule 9011 . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Artificial Intelligence in Bankruptcy Law: A Modern Legal Frontier
Critical Case Comment – Five Theories of Post-Confirmation Property Treatment
Kristina Stanger and Jessica Hopton Youngberg
Rollin’ Rollin’ Rollin’ – Whether a Motor Home Qualifies for the Homestead Exemption as a Mobile Home?
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 2 Rules Related to SBRA
Kellner Retires
Win Now, Wreck Later: A Tale of Bankruptcy and Mortgage Servicing
Escrow 101 – Part 3 of 3
Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka
Critical Case Comment – Frontloading Attorney’s Fees