By Holly Davala, Staff Attorney for Chapter 13 Trustee Craig Shopneck
Case Summary:
McLaughlin v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP, 2014 WL 2883891 (3rd Cir. June 26, 2014). A mortgage company, in error, believed that Timothy McLaughlin was in default and referred the matter to the law firm Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP (“PHS”). PHS sent a letter to McLaughlin. The letter included language that PHS was a debt collector attempting to collect a debt and information PHS obtained could be used for that purpose. The letter included an invoice-like presentation of the amount due . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.
Bankruptcy lawyers can better present non-mortgage homeownership expenses to reflect current economic realities on the means test. By advocating for realistic expense allowances, based on a percentage of the home’s purchase price, attorneys can ensure fairer assessments and more successful bankruptcy plans. Additionally, Trustees and Judges should look at Atty Moran’s analysis here – change will take the whole village.
By David Cox,1 Cox Law Group, PLLC (Lynchburg, VA) Click here for Part 1 of 3 Click here for Part 2 of 3 C. Challenges unique to older debtors. Mobility/hearing attendance requirements. Attendance at 341 hearing. Section 343 Examination of the debtor clearly . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only...
The recent push for student loan forgiveness has been met with increasing opposition. The rationales for not providing a generally applicable path for student loan forgiveness or cancellation have included arguments based upon imagined unfairness to those previously able to pay off their loans, which seems to be both short-sighted, as well as a “red herring” argument. It does not...
“Several recent bankruptcy cases have considered the circumstances under which funds held in, derived from, or contributed to a retirement account may be exempt from the bankruptcy estate.”
For your summer reading, Judge Norton shares with subscribers a three-part outline on zealous advocacy followed by a multi-part Addendum of case summaries broken into various categories. We believe you will enjoy this resource.
“A bankruptcy court has ‘few more powerful remedies at its disposal’ than the revocation of a debtor’s previously granted discharge. And because of the ‘fresh start’ objective of bankruptcy, revoking a discharge is not an action that should be taken lightly.
More than the title implies, this piece offers real-world pointers on preparing clients for their Meeting of Creditors – both legal and emotional. “My rules for those testifying under oath are simple: . . . If I start talking, you stop talking.”
Special congratulations to Michael B. Baker*, Edward C. Boltz*, Hon. D. Sims Crawford, Melissa J. Davey, Kara K. Gendron*, and Hon. Michael E. Romero*.
In any given year Chapter 13 Trustees administer 400,000 to 500,000 cases and distribute almost $5 billion to creditors. A critical duty for trustees is to be sure that distributions are correctly delivered to an allowed claimant. 11 USC § 501 governs the filing of a proof of claim and 11 USC § 502 sets forth the requirements for allowance...
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
Webinars
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Member Articles
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
Industry News
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:
Watch Your Language
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Holly Davala, Staff Attorney for Chapter 13 Trustee Craig Shopneck
Case Summary:
McLaughlin v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP, 2014 WL 2883891 (3rd Cir. June 26, 2014). A mortgage company, in error, believed that Timothy McLaughlin was in default and referred the matter to the law firm Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP (“PHS”). PHS sent a letter to McLaughlin. The letter included language that PHS was a debt collector attempting to collect a debt and information PHS obtained could be used for that purpose. The letter included an invoice-like presentation of the amount due . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Re-Examining the Means Test Cost of Home Ownership
Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 3 of 3
From the AO
Student Loans Debacle-Part II: Failure to Forgive – The Ticking Time-Bomb
Recent Cases Navigate Retirement Account Exemptions
Thoughts on Zealous Advocacy: When Do Bankruptcy Lawyers Cross the Line? Part 1 History of Zealous Advocacy
Lashinsky v. Pennington Opinion Revoking Discharge
When the Biggest Battle Is Beating 341 Anxiety
Congratulations to the 37th Class of The American College of Bankruptcy
Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!