ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Discharge and Dischargeability
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Imputing agent’s fraud requires that debtor knew or should have known of agent’s fraud. When record did not establish that debtor knew or had reason to know of sales agent’s misrepresentation to judgment creditor, agent’s fraud was not imputed to debtor/principal. Decisions from the Supreme Court, including Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 133 S.Ct. 1754 (2013), “appear to cut strongly against applying imputed fraud under § 523(a)(2)(A) to except a debt from discharge in the absence of showing of . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”
Expectations for the 341 Meeting of Creditors
Passing of Our Friend
Critical Case Comment – Pre-Confirmation Payments
A Fireside Chat with…Dr. ChatGPT – Products Available
Kellner Retires
From the Archives
American College of Bankruptcy Announces Class 37 Inductees
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases
Rule 3004 Can Help Debtor’s Attorney Save the Day (and the House)