By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) It constitutes an unfair discrimination, violative of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(1), for a Chapter 13 plan which would pay more to a student loan than to the remaining general unsecured creditors. (Somers) In re Kane, 603 B.R. 491 (Bankr. C.D. Kan. June 18, 2019) Case Summary Ronald Kane filed...
From the Editor – Avoidance Actions
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Chapter 13 debtors had authority to bring avoidance action. Applying §§ 522(g) and (h), the debtors could pursue avoidance of a prebankruptcy tax sale under § 548, with the court concluding that “reasonably equivalent value” could not be ascertained from a tax foreclosure sale under applicable New Jersey law, distinguishing BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531 (1994). Here, the tax debt was $36,000 and the property value was at least $100,000 more than the debt. Matter of Varquez, 502 B.R . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Critical Case Comment
From the Editor – Claims
After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 3
From the Editor – Plan Modification
From the Editor – Debtor’s Attorney
Report of the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy
Tax Form 1099 Needs A Closer Look: Chances Are It’s Wrong
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs