By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo I. Cramdown Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §1325(a)(5)(B) Section 1325(a) sets forth the requirements for a court to confirm a chapter 13 bankruptcy plan. In respect to each secured claim provided for in a plan, 11 U.S.C. §1325(a)(5) provides the following three...
From the Editor’s Desk – Attorney Fees and Issues
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Out of state firm, and local counsel, representing debtors failed to provide adequate representation. Neither Florida law firm, which solicited business nationally as provider of mortgage defense and bankruptcy services, nor its local attorneys, provided adequate representation of Chapter 13 debtors when Florida firm failed to adequately supervise paralegals and legal assistants in preparation of petition and schedules, and local counsel recklessly provided ECF login and password to Florida firm. Attorneys also failed to attend hearing on motion to dismiss for filing deficiencies, which standing order required. Substitute attorney . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – 3002.1 and Reverse Mortgages
Practice Pointers for Arguing Motions
Bankruptcy Court Strikes Back: Awarding $825,940.55 in Sanctions for Bad Faith Filing
From the Editor – Claims
Passing of Chief Judge – Central District of California
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 1 of 4
Who Is Stupid Here?
Meet a Brand-New Trustee
The Dollar Dance: Boosting Deductions in Bankruptcy’s Means Test
Leadership, Office Culture, & Policy