The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
Carroll v. Logan, 735 F.3d 147 (4th Cir. October 28, 2013) (Wynn). A post-petition inheritance received by a Chapter 13 debtor more than 180-days after the filing of the petition constitutes property of the estate and can be committed to fund a modified Chapter 13 plan.
Case Summary
In 2009, the Carrolls filed a Chapter 13 petition proposing five years of payments that would apparently not pay all unsecured claims in full. Three years after this filing, the debtors . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
In the Greatest Hits Department . . .
What I Learned about Bankruptcy on Facebook
Critical Case Comment – New Bankruptcy Term – “Sale Plan”
Critical Case Comment – Fee Wars: The Battle Over Debtor Attorney Compensation
Chapter 12 and Act2/Conference Update
Escrow 102 – Part 2 of 4
Are Direct Payments by Debtor on Mortgage Considered Payments “Under the Plan” for Purposes of Discharge?
Why Junk the Whole System When Minor Remedies Would Suffice?
Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? Part 2: Looking Beyond In re Rhodes