The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Heideker
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Heideker, 455 B.R. 263 (Bankr. M.D. Fla., June 2, 2011) (Adams)
If a Trustee objects to a Chapter 13 Debtor’s proposed plan modification, the Debtor cannot shorten the term of the plan below the applicable commitment period unless the Debtor pays all unsecured claims in full.
Case Summary
Debtors in two Chapter 13 cases proposed to modify their plans to pre-pay the amount they had proposed to pay when their plans were confirmed but do so . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Escrow 102 – Part 2 of 4
FFIEC Issues Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending
Sanctions in South Carolina
CARES Act Financial Hardship ‘Laundry List’
Critical Case Comment
Escrow 101 – Part 3 of 3
Fulton’s Aftermath – What Do Chapter 13 Practitioners Need To Know?
A Salute to the Consumer Litigation Five Star General
Critical Case Comment – How Much Is It Worth – Then/Now?
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – What Does It Mean to Surrender?