The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Heideker
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Heideker, 455 B.R. 263 (Bankr. M.D. Fla., June 2, 2011) (Adams)
If a Trustee objects to a Chapter 13 Debtor’s proposed plan modification, the Debtor cannot shorten the term of the plan below the applicable commitment period unless the Debtor pays all unsecured claims in full.
Case Summary
Debtors in two Chapter 13 cases proposed to modify their plans to pre-pay the amount they had proposed to pay when their plans were confirmed but do so . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Consumer Foreclosure Procedures
Jan M. Sensenich
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13© – Part 6 of 6
Claims Secured by Personal Property
Tax Projections and the Means Test
Here’s What Taxpayers Should Consider When Determining If They Need to File
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
Critical Case Comment – “Extraordinary” Key to Set Aside Dismissal
For Shame
From the Editor – Curing Default