A reverse mortgage, having fallen due as a result of the death of the borrower, is not protected from modification by the borrower’s heirs by virtue of § 1322(c)(2). (Halfenger) In re Sandoval, 2022 WL 982182 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. March 31, 2022) Case Summary Juan Sandoval filed Chapter 13 and proposed a plan which dealt with his principal asset, a...
From the Editor – Curing Default
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor could cure default beyond 60 months. Agreeing with In re Klaas, 858 F.3d 820 (3d Cir. 2017), bankruptcy court had discretion to permit debtors to cure plan default, allowing a reasonable grace period beyond the 60 months of confirmed plan. Dismissal of the case for plan default was not required under § 1307(c), because dismissal was discretionary. Section 1328 does not expressly require that all payments under the plan be made within 60 months. Remand was ordered for the bankruptcy court to consider the non . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
While Chapter 7 Filings Continue to Decline, Chapter 13 Filings are Trending Slightly Upward
Max’s Knowledge Nugget
These Summer Activities Can Affect Next Year’s Tax Returns
If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
From the Editor – Plan Modification
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Statement of Intention: Deadlines and Consequences
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Statute and Rules Amendments Not Related to SBRA
Critical Case Comment– Reverse Mortgage May be Modified
How to Manage Unprofessional and Discourteous Attorneys
Delaware Trustee Michael Joseph to Retire