The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Hatfield v. Thompson – Why Debtors (and Their Counsel) Should be Very Afraid of Husky
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Academy Staff
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz.1 The Supreme Court concluded that § 523(a)(2)(A)’s “actual fraud” standard did not require the debt Plaintiff sought to except from discharge itself resulted from or was based on fraud. Instead, it is sufficient for purposes of § 523(a)(2)(A) that the debtor seeking to discharge the debt perpetrated some fraud that perhaps reduced the creditor’s ability to collect on its judgment. In . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
WE LOVE AND WILL MISS YOU, HELEN
Critical Case Comment – Present Tense in § 544(b)
Leaders Must Take Action to Halt Foreclosure Crisis for Minorities
Max’s Knowledge Nugget
Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge
Substantial Contribution Claims
How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 4 – Making Willful Stay Violations Pay Off
Rule 3002.1, Contempt and Sanctions – How a Lender Can Create a Mess
Is Your Law Practice Evolving to Incorporate New Technology
Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car