Hatfield v. Thompson – Why Debtors (and Their Counsel) Should be Very Afraid of Husky

By Academy Staff

On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz.1 The Supreme Court concluded that § 523(a)(2)(A)’s “actual fraud” standard did not require the debt Plaintiff sought to except from discharge itself resulted from or was based on fraud. Instead, it is sufficient for purposes of § 523(a)(2)(A) that the debtor seeking to discharge the debt perpetrated some fraud that perhaps reduced the creditor’s ability to collect on its judgment. In . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Fourth Circuit Examines Tenancy by Entirety

The Honorable William Houston Brown

May 19, 2024

The Fourth Circuit ruled that federal tax debts can affect one spouse's interest in such property, even if the debt isn't jointly held. They also clarified that the value of a debtor's share in this type of property isn't necessarily the fair market value of the whole property, but rather their interest in the tenancy.

Members

Courts are Expanding the Protections of Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1

Debbie Langehennig, Cameron Kelly

October 9, 2022

As a prerequisite to a claim’s payment, Rule 3002.1 requires certain secured creditors to provide to the trustee and the debtor notice of the full value of the secured creditor’s claim, including any “fees, expenses, and charges” related to the claim. Two bankruptcy courts have demonstrated a willingness to expand the reach of Rule 3002.1’s noticing requirements. These courts generally...

Members

From the Editor

March 17, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Confirmation - Bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation. Distinguishing between “self-executing” provisions of the Code and those sections that were not “self-executing,” and discussing Espinosa’s impact on that distinction, District Court held that the bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation based on the above- median...

Members

Interspousal Claims Live On and On and On

Cathy Moran

April 21, 2024

Even when the contentions against a debtor spouse sound in fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or intentional tort, the claims of the debtor’s spouse survive a Chapter 7 discharge.

Members

Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 18, 2022

Where a debtor fails to disclose to the Court or the trustee a forbearance on his mortgage that he was to pay directly, the Court would grant the trustee’s motion to modify to recapture as much as possible of the surplus funds the forbearance generated. (Kenney) In re Ilyev, 2022 WL 2965029 (Bankr. E.D. Va. July 26, 2022) Case Summary...

Members

Well, I Thought We Were Surrendering the Vehicle

John Hooge

September 29, 2024

In a Chapter 7 client surrendered her vehicle. Case was filed declaring such and no vehicle ownership expense was claimed. Subsequently, the lender offered a modified loan with a reduced monthly payment that was found acceptable. Accordingly, client now plans to reaffirm. This raises several procedural questions Attorney Hooge answers for us.

Members

Recommendations in Dealing with the Self-Employed Debtor

Andrew B. Finberg

January 25, 2026

Few word combinations sting a Trustee’s office quite like the one-two punch of “self-employed.” The “self-employed” debtor immediately faces additional concerns regarding feasibility.

Members

The VA Loan Trap: Broken Promises and New Hurdles for Veterans

Roberto Rivera

November 17, 2024

“The VA created a program to capture missed payments and "put them to the end of the loan," but they eliminated it. . . . Many Veterans were forced to accept loan modifications that increased their payments. Those who didn't accept or were denied modifications were promised a new program, VASP.”

Members

Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

July 31, 2022

Chapter 13 debtor’s profligate, pre-petition spending and post-petition lack of candor, demonstrated that the plan was not proposed in good faith and the petition was not filed in good faith. (Frank) In re Ames, 2022 WL 2195469 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. June 17, 2022) Case Summary In April of 2018, after 10 years of marriage, Guy Ames initiated a divorce complaint...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

December 13, 2020

By Professor Nancy Rapoport Dear Readers: The ConsiderChapter13.org staff has, once again, raised an important ethics issue: how far does the attorney-client privilege go? In Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm v. United States,1 the Fifth Circuit had to wrestle with that issue after the law firm (Taylor Lohmeyer) claimed a blanket attorney-client privilege for all documents that were subject to the...

Hatfield v. Thompson – Why Debtors (and Their Counsel) Should be Very Afraid of Husky

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Fourth Circuit Examines Tenancy by Entirety

Courts are Expanding the Protections of Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1

From the Editor

Interspousal Claims Live On and On and On

Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!

Well, I Thought We Were Surrendering the Vehicle

Recommendations in Dealing with the Self-Employed Debtor

The VA Loan Trap: Broken Promises and New Hurdles for Veterans

Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: